Anonymous ID: 7037ff Dec. 8, 2020, 11:27 a.m. No.11951488   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>11951429

>you're religious ideology is showing!

~~You're~~ Your

<There I fixed it for you. Good thing Grammar kitty wasn't here.

Also: No your religious ideology is showing. Quite clearly in fact.

You would be hard pressed to find me showing my "religious ideology" as I'm an atheist… retard.

>Freakin' learn something before puking all over everything!

Likewise.

>REFUTE the message if you're so smart!

That would require me to watch the video, which I really don't intent to do. As its obvious "God of the gaps" fallacy didn't need it to be pointed out.

Anonymous ID: 7037ff Dec. 8, 2020, 11:41 a.m. No.11951641   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1723

>>11951352

Here is your refutation Christcuck:

>it is IMPOSSIBLE that human intellect wrote the Bible!

Prove it.

It was possible for the human intellect to find the message, so why would it be impossible for the human intellect to create it.

Just because you don't possess the ability doesn't mean others don't either.

Also have you heard of Paraidolia? How do you know it's not just confirmation bias and there really is no message? It's certainly not the first time religious people have bent the rules of science to prove a point.

 

And before these 2 questions are answered satisfactory, watching your video is of no use as the premise you've put forth is flawed at its base.

 

Now will you shut up about people not being able to "refute" the message?