Salient wisdom from a lawfag in this anon's orbit:
>I keep saying this but - The SCOTUS has not considered a case this consequential since Marbury v. Madison.
Indeed. But we don't doxx Wednesday on QRG
o7
LA Joins Texas Case against GA/PA/MI/WI!!!
https://twitter.com/AGJeffLandry/status/1336414026033733633
Just spoke w/ @KenPaxtonTX on SCOTUS case:
"I'm not making a fraud argument, I'm making an argument based on the Constitution … state law was changed by people other than the state legislature, which is the only Constitutionally authorized changes"
https://twitter.com/carriesheffield/status/1336413580804153347
TX case will likely decide it all.
There are issues of Federal Constitutional Law- namely whether the Secretaries of State could ignore the laws made by the state legislatures in deciding their electors.
This is one of the finer points that folks usually fail to understand. States have to appoint electors. They can do it however they choose. Popular election, lottery, Rock-Paper-Scissors tournament.
However they do it, though - it's gotta be approved by the legislature. Fiat decisions by the state SecState won't cut it.
This is likely why the TX case will be victorious. SCOTUS will tell the states to sort their shit out through their legislatures.
The PA GOP case and the Texas AG case are two totally different animals.