>>11955122

I tend to think it is because QR general breads have been so fucked up over the last few days. Half of them don't work, or freeze up, and typical baker war about bread numbering, etc. Q comes on to post, and just sees chaos, so he posted here.

I'm glad you guys are discussing StarLink. Anon has often concluded that the only way to really ensure future comms is to have a new system based in space. Would be great to see something like personal cube-sats, which you own, which can talk to other cube sats forming a network. Do away with their cables, nodes, ICANN, and provider gateways. Raw access.

>>11955999

Me again, with a different UID. I barely know enough about the topic to even discuss it, but I'm glad there are other people thinking about it. From a systems & control point of view, there are not many options for how to bypass the [DS] ability to manage information flow.

A cloud of mini-sats would be awesome, yes. Even these are regulated according to altitudes and bandwidth, as I understand it. Personal cube sats only stay aloft a few years because of degrading orbits. I gather Starlink must be higher, there again though it is a 'system' through which we must pay someone access and then follow their rules.

Quantum communication could be a thing in the future, maybe that could be our ultimate freedom. At the moment they have us by the balls, with both restriction on communication AND restriction of travel. Something must change.