Anonymous ID: 72da1d ==Judicial Insider== Dec. 8, 2020, 3:39 p.m. No.11954536   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4545 >>4639

>>11954314

This is a common practice when there is a bigger, almost exact case. The Texas case has been put on docket already. This TX case supercedes the PA case that was dismissed. So the decision today is not the sauce today, the fact the TX case was put on the docket is the sauce.

Anonymous ID: 72da1d SCOTUS Dec. 8, 2020, 3:57 p.m. No.11954798   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11954734

 

JJP does not understand the American judicial system. With the biggerSAMEcase out of Texas, the PA case is irrelevant.

 

To those that do know the system, today's dismissal means nothing.

 

NOW YOU KNOW

Anonymous ID: 72da1d SCOTUS Dec. 8, 2020, 3:58 p.m. No.11954823   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11954734

 

JJP does not understand the American judicial system. With the biggerSAMEcase out of Texas, the PA case>>11954655

is irrelevant.

 

To those that do know the system, today's dismissal means nothing.

 

NOW YOU KNOW

Anonymous ID: 72da1d Dec. 8, 2020, 4:01 p.m. No.11954866   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11954734

 

JJP does not understand the American judicial system. With the biggerSAMEcase out of Texas, the PA case >>11954289

is irrelevant.

 

To those that do know the system, today's dismissal means nothing.

 

NOW YOU KNOW