Anonymous ID: 54c895 Dec. 8, 2020, 6:52 p.m. No.11957360   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Could it be this simple to allow for a military commission for civilian\alien unlawful enemy combatant to be punished as a court-martial direct?

 

Check out the laws below where a military commission has jurisdiction.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/948d

 

10 U.S. Code § 948d - Jurisdiction of military commissions

 

A military commission under this chapter shall have jurisdiction to try persons subject to this chapter for any offense made punishable by this chapter, sections 904 and 906 of this title (articles 104 and 106 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), or the law of war, whether such offense was committed before, on, or after September 11, 2001, and may, under such limitations as the President may prescribe, adjudge any punishment not forbidden by this chapter, including the penalty of death when specifically authorized under this chapter. A military commission is a competent tribunal to make a finding sufficient for jurisdiction.

 

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, § 1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2576.)

 

"section 904" is the key.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/904

 

10 U.S. Code § 904 - Art. 104. Public records offenses

 

Any person subject to this chapter who, willfully and unlawfully—

(1)alters, conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys a public record; or

(2)takes a public record with the intent to alter, conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, or destroy the public record;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, § 5415, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2944.)

 

Let's write that law in relation to physical and digital ballets as they are public record.

 

"Any person who willfully and unlawfully alters, conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys a physical or digital ballet or takes a physical or digital ballet with the intent to alter, conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, or destroy the public record; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct."

 

Would this be a correct assumption?

 

Is this why it had to be this way?