Anons, retired U.S. Navy Intelligence Officer D.E. Dyer's compelling treatment of POTUS' impending action under Executive Order No. 13848 "Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election", gets only moar and moar gratifying with each rereading. The lofty, righteous and prescient manner of her writing style almost suggests that Commander Dyer was "hand-picked" to author the Forward to the official historical treatise of the upcoming epic, Republic-saving actions of President Donald J. Trump. Once all the dust has settled and after all, or almost all, the facts about the extent and the gravity of the threats against him and his Administration, the Country and the American People are finally disclosed, Donald Trump will be considered by many to be the greatest President our Country has ever had.
As Commander Dyer records:
"The executive order route to a Trump victory, to be tried only after the state legislatures and the legal avenues have been exhausted:
This third effort, for which we may discern the potential without having yet seen specific evidence, is the one Hollywood would make a movie out of. It’s about concrete particulars, clashing interests, and action (who knows, there might be a good car-chase in it somewhere). I have no idea if it involves a server raid in Germany, or some of the other exotic allegations making the rounds out there. Fortunately, this analysis doesn’t depend on such specifics.
The premise of the key supporting effort is that the U.S. government has been making use of tools we know it has, to gather intelligence on conditions that pose an obvious threat to U.S. national security. …
Being cued to these conditions and their possibilities probably depended, at some point, on alertment from the links of major voting system vendors to foreign interests. Some of these links have been known, to the public as well as to experts and members of Congress, for more than a decade.
One such link is that between the Smartmatic voting software company and Venezuela. Prior to 2016, Democrats were as apt to be concerned about it as Republicans; indeed, as recently as 2018, Democrats like Elizabeth Warren pointed out undeniable vulnerabilities in the Smartmatic software which facilitate vote tampering. The Smartmatic company was founded in Boca Raton by a small handful of dual-citizen entrepreneurs whose expertise was in deploying voting software that cooked votes for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela — something reported and well-known in the U.S. long before Sidney Powell obtained an affidavit for her Georgia lawsuit from an individual with direct knowledge of Smartmatic’s history.
Smartmatic software is used in both the Dominion Voting Systems machines and those of Election Systems & Software (ES&S). The user manual published for Dominion machines used in Colorado for recent elections in fact described the very vulnerabilities of the systems to on-site tampering as if they were a feature and not a bug. It has been astoundingly well known that these weaknesses are present in hundreds of voting machines used across America, and that they were originally designed to help Hugo Chavez manipulate votes electronically.
But the point for this third line of campaign effort is that the vulnerability, combined with its foreign connection, could justifiably be seen as a national security issue. Persisting for years, it could well have been exploited for some time, with the intention – on someone’s part, foreign or domestic – to keep exploiting it. …
Just the information in the last nine paragraphs [which included China’s role in getting awfully close to Dominion] is enough to justify the kind of electronic information retrieval and surveillance the American public knows the U.S. government is well able to undertake.
And, as well-informed readers have no doubt been anxious for as many paragraphs now to point out, President Trump issued an executive order in September 2018, E.O. 13848, designating foreign threats to voting systems as a significant national security concern. …
The effect of the E.O. was to articulate the national security justification for the means of surveillance to monitor and track what was being done with the implicated voting infrastructure. In other words, whether the analysts were at Homeland Security (chartered with monitoring critical infrastructure), the FBI, Treasury, or even — for the foreign-power aspect of the problem — at CIA, they had presidential authority to pull trons and go to town.
(continued)