>Californians, Chinese Scooping Up Farmland in Washington State?

>Chinese comapany owns 146,000 acres of US. farmland?

Anons,

This has been going on about 15 years that I personally know of. I guess the plan is to buy up all of America's small family farm land, then, one year, suddenly refuse to roll out the planting tractors.

By the time we figure out what (((they))) did, planting weeks would be over with. The nation will starve for failure to plant crops.

Food for guns trade begins.

Went to local map office, and county land recorders office about 15 years ago to find out who was buying all the farm land around us. The county office told me that keeping track of this information had been "CONTRACTED OUT" to the people in the office across the street. She gave me the address to their office. I got there. Nothing but a small strip mall window store; an empty table with one chair and a locked door with no sign. (Shell co?).

Never could find anyone who could tell me who was buying all the farmland here in Ohio. Called state rep. He sounded surprised to hear this "contracted company" information with the dead office. Never heard back from him. This was15 years ago.

Have to add to this:

That this year in Amish country, the Amish did something they have never done. They usually only plant enough of their average 100 acer farms to feed their own families for the year, plus a bit to sell at their veggie stands on their farms. This would never be more than 1/3-2/3 of an acre every year.

This year, as we drove along, we noticed their farms were planted with 3-5 acers of veggies each farm. Spouse anon and I kept stopping to look at the outrageous 300-500% increase in the food production on just our local Amish farms, all of them.

We suspect they know something is happening to our food supply as the Amish are far more connected than people think they are.

Here is the thing.

Family farms owned by American citizens are in fact critical national security infrastructure. NO FOREIGN ENTITY SHOULD BE BUYING OUT OUR LAND CAPACITY TO MAKE FOOD for OUR COUNTRY – EVER. (Especially China)

Huge corporate ownership is also an extremely bad thing, because those corporations can be bought out in a heartbeat, causing the same problem. [think CEO resignations]

Corporations, like China, are in the game to buy up farm land and let it go fallow possibly at the very wrong time. I do not trust corporate owned farms unless the corporate owner is the actual farmer working the land, period.

This issue is as important as the voting issue and we must deal with it asap, or starve within the next 10 years.

>>11956021 ALL PB

>Californians, Chinese Scooping Up Farmland in Washington State

>https://www.nbcnews.com/business/real-estate/californians-chinese-scooping-farmland-washington-state-n401841

>CHINA BUYS GRAND CANYON

>December 10, 2012 by Tap Vann

>https://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/53230/china-buys-grand-canyon/

>>11956200

>Chinese comapany owns 146,000 acres of US. farmland

(Trust me when I say, the Chinese have bought up FAR MORE than 146,000 acres, and they are hiding the records of their ownership)

https://www.technocracy.news/foreigners-own-30-million-acres-of-prime-u-s-farmland/

>>11959930

>>11959930

>>>11959920 (You)

>shell/invetment companies

Ok FINE.

Here is my legal argument about how to STOP this. Every lawfag here remembers the last chapter of property law called the "RULE against PERPETUITIES?"

Rule against perpetuities - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_against_perpetuities

> The rule against perpetuities is a legal rule in the Anglo-American common law that prevents people from using legal instruments (usually a deed or a will) to exert control over the ownership of private property for a time long beyond the lives of people living at the time the instrument was written.

THIS LAW prevents YOU and ME from passing our property down to "my family forever" in a will.

I say corporate and secret trust ownership of farmland allows corporations/trusts to by-pass the intention of this law and works an injustice where real people are disadvantaged because corporations never die and people do.

The whole point of the rule against perpetuities was to keep land "in commerce" so it's value is never locked up into the hands of the few.

Corporations are fictitious people.

Farm land is critical infrastructure.

Perhaps an equal protection arguement.

Why are people forbidden to keep land forever by blood, but, corporations can keep it forever, gathering it until there is no more land for humans to buy to feed themselves?

Big problem guys.

Human can only own land for a lifetime.

Corporations can own it forever.

>>11959920

See

>>11959971

>>11959920

IMHO, farm land, like the right to vote, should only be held by flesh and blood human beings. All other entities do not satisfy the rule against perpetuities, that was made in common law to protect future generations from finding themselves in a situation where a few families owned the land. This rule needs to either be applied to corporations, trust, and other entity land owners by limiting their rights of ownership to a human lifetime, OR, ownership of farm land needs to be like the right to vote.

Corporations have no right to vote. (fictitious persons)

Non profits have no right to vote. (fictitious persons)

Trusts have no right to vote. (fictitious persons)

The rights in the Constitution belong to living humans. All others have rights granted by the government and not the creator. Therefore, for the safety of humanity, farmland (food production) needs to be held by flesh and blood humans.

>>11959971

Baker, if you Notable, please include this comment on the Rule against Perpetuities in Estates and Trusts property laws of the United States Common Law. (Usually last chapter in law school property law books)