Read it and weep demoncrats and rino's.
I was a little too excited when I posted this.
After looking through the rulings, I'm not finding the text I posted.
Looks like more fake crap from the internet… :(
At the top of the filing there is this text…
Primary Holding
It is unconstitutional to try civilians by military tribunals unless there is no civilian court available.
That does not bode well for our hopes here.
Not at all.
I just found a ruling in the past that works against real justice.
I was simply trying to sauce the correctness of what I posted when I noticed that bit of text.
I know full well about the spies… even females hung!
I think once they are at Gitmo, all rights are waived.
Good question, but I'm not a law fag.
Common sense would seem to dictate it so, but the I think they may be labeled as traitors, thereby allowing military tribunals to commence.
It's two differing rulings. The first from 1866 and the second from some unknown time in section 98.
Your logic would apply if they both came from 1866.
But I was unable to confirm either so It's a moot point. Calling BS on my own post. I was excited… check your facts before posting…. grrr