>>11970377 (p/b)

>So all that was released is that the FBI has his laptop and 20k pages of information about it that will take months to release because they are short staffed due to COVID, correct?

>>11970390 (p/b)

you know that most of the FBI people are good, right?

As a CS for FBI for the past X years, and in particular this year, yes the FBI is operating under different rules due to COVID. I found it interesting during my debriefings - no masks… LOL. I don't think they are short-staffed, but COVID sure gives them cover to make the people think that.

I personally think the s/a I'm assigned to is a good guy, but I've been debriefed by two and the other also strikes me as a good guy. Body language. I also think they appreciate that I can think outside of their narrow procedures and gather evidence outside of their narrow rules.

I have reason to believe they know I'm on to something, they're taking it seriously, and decision is not in their hands on what to do with physical evidence turned over.

I think they know darn well there are local roadblocks over at DOJ. Based on a few things dropped to me. They might be able to track a leaker / roadblock based on follow-up incidents reported. I've been curious to try to discover if two suspected roadblocks from early on in the Obama admin are still assigned locally. Also a federal judge.

Obviously, I can't provide any sauce or describe enough without putting a huge target on my forehead.

ANONS might disagree with handing over evidence, but it's worth a shot. If nothing is done, go public. Exposes roadblocks did nothing. So far, I'm still alive.

That said, I can think of at least two out of five other agents that I've come across are not good guys.

Judge individually.