https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163367/20201210142206254_Pennsylvania%20Opp%20to%20Bill%20of%20Complaint%20v.FINAL.pdf
Texas is Not Entitled to the Extraordinary
Preliminary Injunction it Seeks
A. Texas cannot meet the high standard for
injunctive relief
B. Texas’s request to disenfranchise tens of
millions of voters who reasonably relied
upon the law at the time of the election
does great damage to the public interest
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, the Court should
deny the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and
the motion for preliminary injunction and temporary
restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay
Exactly. They even say
The State of Texas has now added its voice to the
cacophony of bogus claims.
What Texas is doing in this proceeding is to ask this
Court to reconsider a mass of baseless claims about
problems with the election that have already been considered, and rejected, by this Court and other courts.
Is that not up to the SC to decide?
Exactly. They even say
The State of Texas has now added its voice to the
cacophony of bogus claims.
What Texas is doing in this proceeding is to ask this
Court to reconsider a mass of baseless claims about
problems with the election that have already been considered, and rejected, by this Court and other courts.
Is that not up to the SC to decide…