TY baker!
You idiots are hastily trying to divide Patriots by falling over yourselves to infiltrate and intervene in what is in actuality healthy and not at all final 'disagreement' in data security.
This is normal life, it happens among Patriots, let it play out and you're not fooling anyone to say that initial disagreements with CM is somehow instant proof Bongino is 'comped'.
Let the evidence speak, not your pre-determined narrative of division.
Oh come is that the best you have to support your attacks?
>So exposing this clown is dividing Patriots?
You're begging the question. How does Bongino's disagreement with CM up until now constitute 'being exposed'?
May he is being exposed, maybe he isn't, but there is not enough evidence yet, all you have and all I have is that two people disagree with each other.
Maybe in your radical left worldview the mere presence of disagreement is in itself proof one side is 'comped' by…whatever…but in the world of logic and evidence it is logic and evidence that prove people as 'comped', not mere disagreements.
>I notice you substituted the term 'patriots' for anons.
I notice you failed to recognize the fact that once we're speaking about 'doxxed' people, such as in this case with BONGINO and WATKINS, they are BY DEFINITION not posting comments in an 'Anon' capacity.
WTF is wrong with you? "I noticed you did not all non-anonymous commenters 'Anons'". Well duh of course I didn't, their comments are not Anonymous!
>In poker they call that a tell.
In poker there is bluffing, and you're bluffing.
Truth is, the fact you're so insanely eager and through absence of information so desperate to divide Bongino and Watkins, is proof you're a shill.
Watkins just tweeted that he offered to SHOW Bongino what he is talking about.
Let the evidence speak for itself. For all you know, Bongino could very well end up tweeting that he heard Watkin's arguments and is taking action.
Or, Bongino could do something else, and only then can you have the requisite information to conclude Bongino is 'comped'.
You're way too hasty to judge for you to credible. There is no way to tell you apart from deep state shills who have been attacking Bongino for years.
"There will be no civil war" - Q
Soros goons are not 'representative' of 78% of the population that knows there was election fraud.
In DC it is an informational civil war, not a bloody one.
Nah, that 'ride' of 'division' is exactly what I am referring to with me as observing it.
Just like what you're doing.
Except the 'battle' to divide is only from the division shills eager to jump all in to attack in order to divide.
The 'battle' between Bongino and Watkins is different.
Maybe double meanings, but it would be wrong to dismiss that what the DOJ is doing with stopping the murder and kidnapping of natives is only to send 'comms' about a Kenyan Manchurian candidate.
>Believe what you want
Now see that's again just tacit division shill code. To dismiss everything a people think as merely 'beliefs' totally negates logic and evidence as the arbiter.
The muhjoo shills wanted to SUPPRESS theCHINESE MONEY STRING PULLINGso that everyone would focus on MOSSAD's "4am talking point CONTENT which alone would NEVER STOP THE FAKE NEWS.
Fake News would NEVER STOP if all that was done was people 'seething' over content source originators but totally ignoring the BY DESIGN SUPPRESSED STRING PULLING mechanism by which DIRECTLY motivates fake news bobble heads to SPEAK the content as part of their JOB.
I DO NOT NEED TO REJECT THE THEORY THAT MOS IS PRINARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT OF FAKE NEWS IF I WERE TO IDENTIFY THE 'MUHJOO' SHILLS AS PURPOSEFULLY TRYING TO SUPPRESS CHINA MONEY STRING PULLING IN ORDER TO KEEP THE FRAUD GOING YEAR AFTER YEAR
Define 'disinformation from the CCP'.
>Fuck Bongino
Your personal views are irrelevant without logic and evidence.
If you attack me for daring to 'not like' the fact that there are disagreements, YOU WOULD ONLY BE PROJECTING.
I don't care if people disagree, what matters is settling logical contradictions and evidence claims against other evidence claims.
You're making this personal when I don't give a shit about you personally, we're all anons here.
You can go fuck yourself while I continue to review and assess the information coming out of both Bongino and Watkins, in order to decide.
You seem to be upset that I am disagreeing with you, more than me being upset that you're disagreeing with me. I don't care about you,
>Posting the Flag one time each bread is not spam
Yes it is.
Posting ANTYHING bread after bread after bread, if you falsely conclude it is not spam, then logically each bread could be filled with 751 of the exact same posts, in bread after bread after bread, and by your shit logic not of it is spam because there are 751 'unique' posts each bread.
When the same shit is posted bread after bread after bread after bread, that is the definition of spam for ANY number of 'unique' posts.
The fact you claim there is such thing as a 'correct flag' is proof you're a division shill.
What is not permanent is your master's scripts they sent to you for $.
Tick tock.
Kek, now you're trying to deflect the division narrative and lump in Hannity (who gets sources from patriots).
POTUS trusts Hannity.
So much that he showed Hannity on video at many of his rallies.
The pen is Catherine Herridge you retard.
Fuck you morons are low IQ.
NO SAUCE, ALL DIVISION NARRATIVE
The one to rule them all.
>CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above,the Court should deny the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and the motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay.Respectfully submitted, JOSH SHAPIRO Attorney General J. BART DeLONE Chief Deputy Attorney General Appellate Litigation Section Counsel of Record HOWARD G. HOPKIRK CLAUDIA M. TESORO SEAN A. KIRK PATRICK Sr. Deputy Attorneys General MICHAEL J. SCARINCI DANIEL B. MULLEN Deputy Attorneys General
Ftfy