>>11972916 pb

oh boy, that looks good

check the table of contents.

All they've got are legal technicalites

If there were no cheating, why?

For instance, If they were good on the grounds of cheat vs no cheat

they'd bring the evidence that the vote was honest.

NOTHING LIKE THAT IS THERE

ALL TECHNICAL "LEGALISTIC" ARGUMENTS

"no grounds"

"doesn't meet the standard to be heard"

"no basis"

'doesn't meet standard"

And the tricky one

"You will disenfranchise those who we cheated for"

^^^^ That right there could be their achilles heel? BECAUSE?

They are claiming their right to cheat for a MINORITY displases the rights of the MAJORITY

So that's biased judgement rather than equal protection

You can' have equal protection except to enforce fairness between parties

Equal Protection doesn't mean they get something which isn't theirs.

Were the Bidens' pimping their daughter?

What is that?

anybody ever think that's hunter's daughter, not his niece?

Looks more like him, than like the brother.

>>11972133 pb

Looks like a blackmail payment

Awan had Congress blackmailed; that's why it was called "spy ring in Congress"

Maybe whoever voted for this can be arrested?