dChan
Anonymous ID: 282e73 Dec. 10, 2020, 6:58 p.m. No.11976636   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6670

>>11976568

Long term problems baked into this vaccine push. Give it a few years and it’ll be a worldwide tragedy that no one could have foreseen and entirely attributable to the exigencies of the hour.

Anonymous ID: 282e73 Dec. 10, 2020, 7:03 p.m. No.11976699   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6730 >>6794

>>11976622

Not for one story. Spiking one story is an editorial decision.

 

They’d need to get them on an overarching conspiracy involving most of the media and big tech. Strip them of legal protections, FCC licenses, and cut off all public funding to NPR and PBS.

 

Can’t see a DOJ ever doing that work, though.

Anonymous ID: 282e73 Dec. 10, 2020, 7:17 p.m. No.11976843   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6861

>>11976670

I think that’s quite possible, unless the employer has some form of get out immunity. Like the military. The position is a little different for healthcare workers, but even there employers must act reasonably and not with wanton disregard for the consequences.

 

There would be a strong argument that employers recklessly and negligently imposed unreasonable conditions on employees by forcing them to subject themselves to a vaccine that was novel and untested. The data exists even now to support the contention that the circumstances of covid were not sufficiently threatening to warrant any form of vaccine mandate.

 

Hindsight will not be favorable to what’s going on now - those who have overstated the risks of the disease and understated the risks of the vaccine will, if we still have functioning courts, get crushed, IMJ. Employers are also on notice, as the deaths in stage 3 trials and side effects in the roll out have been quite widely reported. No one can claim that they were blind, irrespective of having painted themselves into a corner by the sheer politics of covid.

 

This will be a clusterfuck of epic proportions. I’ve no doubt of that.