>>11969396
The HCQ with zinc or the Ivermectin with zinc and D3 x 2000iu everyday is the way to go alright.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/peer-reviewed-hydroxychloroquine-study-hospitalizations
So we now has the [cheapest] coronavirus answer after 10 or 11 months.
Get treatment at onset when you feel you have a "normal flu" or even a "bad flu".
Do not wait for breathing probs as a symptom.
SIDEBAR
IMPORTANT
Early 2020 I looked up the drama as much as a street pleb could (no medical training worth a crap).
https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/01/30/on-the-origins-of-the-2019-ncov-virus-wuhan-china/
Seems the ICU everywhere was filling up with peeps who are aged or had pre-existing immuno threats etc and the way the china flu kills is that your blood vessels get weak and the blood thickens up. So lungs and cardio probs.
In the lungs it was a immuno over-response (Cytokine Storm) caused by the body fighting the animal virus.
At first this anon did not get the 2020 Flu Shot because viral interference was thought more likely if you have the flu-shot.
Venn diagram:
Circle A – Aged and peeps in care
Circle B – Peeps who get annual flu-shot by default
Circle C – Young peeps
Overlap of circles? There's the problem.
Did the DoD investigate this — because bio-warfare hazard?
Answer - YES
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31607599/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31607599/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31607599/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31607599/
Important! Their study was that the Flushot is great for most human flu virus. But not for coronavirus (animal virus's). Cytokine worries.
That was then.
Now at the end of 2020 other studies show the flu-shot worry is not. a. worry.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250546/ [click the expand button]
—-quote
Influenza vaccination data and viral respiratory laboratory results were obtained for the 2017–2018 influenza season. While the study found no association with influenza vaccination and overall risk of becoming infected with other respiratory viruses (slight decrease in odds was observed), when examining the association with influenza vaccination and the risk of becoming infected with specific viruses at the individual level, there were two viruses that showed significantly increased odds (endemic coronavirus and human metapneumovirus).
Coronavirus results in this study represented the four endemic, regularly circulating strains of coronavirus (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1) during the 2017–2018 influenza season, not novel coronavirus (COVID-19). The four circulating strains of coronavirus have existed in the general population for years, first identified in the mid-1960s. At the time of the study, and even at the time of initial electronic publication, COVID-19 was not yet in existence.
Established levels of immunity in the general population for the four circulating strains of coronavirus at the time of the study when compared to lack of immunity for the novel COVID-19 strain make any sort of correlation between vaccination and COVID-19 invalid.
Therefore, the results of this study cannot and should not be interpreted to represent any sort of relationship or association of influenza vaccination receipt and COVID-19 illness. Results from this study DO NOT support the anti-vaccination viewpoint of avoiding seasonal influenza vaccination, and in fact should be interpreted in the opposite manner, since significant protection against influenza was associated with vaccination receipt, and a slight decrease in the odds of infection from other respiratory viruses was also noted.
Results from this study should not be applied to or interpreted with COVID-19 in any way.
---endquote