Anonymous ID: fa4a18 Dec. 10, 2020, 6:26 p.m. No.11976231   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6238 >>6255 >>6273 >>6347 >>6639 >>6786 >>6891

Project Veritas: GA Senate Candidate Ossoff Deputy Political Director Reveals Democrats Are Hiding Plans to Pack Supreme Court with Liberal Justices

 

Project Veritas on Thursday released undercover video of Georgia Senate candidate Jon Ossoff’s deputy political director revealing the Democrats are hiding their plans to pack the Supreme Court with liberal justices.

 

The corrupt officials in Georgia are trying to steal the 2020 election through voter fraud and they’re also trying to steal the twin senate runoff on January 5th.

 

GOP incumbent Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler are fighting to keep their seats against Marxist Warnock and far left Jon Ossoff.

 

Georgia elections officials a few weeks ago voted to extend the use of ballot drop boxes for the January 5 twin Senate runoff where the Republican majority in the Senate is on the line.

 

The use of ballot drop boxes, which opens the door for illegal ballot harvesting, was set to expire in December, but the 5-member Georgia State Election Board voted to extend the use of drop boxes.

 

Corrupt Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger approved the extension of mail-in voting and drop boxes for the runoff, assuring a Democrat steal.

 

If the Democrats gain the majority in the Senate and steal the White House, they will certainly overthrow the Supreme Court with Marxists.

 

Project Veritas caught Ossoff’s deputy political director on undercover video admitting the Democrats are hiding their plans to pack the Supreme Court.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/project-veritas-ga-senate-candidate-ossoff-deputy-political-director-reveals-democrats-hiding-plans-pack-supreme-court-liberal-justices-video/

Anonymous ID: fa4a18 Dec. 10, 2020, 6:37 p.m. No.11976351   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6368 >>6369 >>6371 >>6398 >>6639 >>6786 >>6891

‘Social justice ICE CREAM’? Ben & Jerry's seeks to ‘dismantle systems of oppression’ with… Colin Kaepernick-themed vegan dessert

 

Ben & Jerry's is diving deeper into woke capitalism by teaming with Colin Kaepernick, the ex-NFL quarterback who became a leftist hero by kneeling during the national anthem, to market a new dessert that promotes racial activism.

 

The company's new “Change the Whirled” frozen dessert, a vegan ice cream substitute made with caramel and cookies, will arrive on store shelves in 2021, Ben & Jerry's said on Thursday. It's touted as “the flavor that's supporting the fight to dismantle systems of oppression and empower black and brown people.”

 

The packaging for “Change the Whirled” features an illustration of Kaepernick, a Black Power fist and the slogan, “I know my rights.” Kaepernick said the venture will “serve up joy on the journey to justice,” and his share of profits will be given to his Know Your Rights Camp legal defense initiative.

 

As for Ben & Jerry's share, that will go to Ben & Jerry's, which was taken over by multinational consumer goods giant Unilever in 2000. The Vermont ice cream maker has long promoted its activism – on issues ranging from LGBTQ rights to GMO labeling to climate change – wrapping its brand identity in feel-good vibes. The company joined in a boycott last June of Facebook and Instagram advertising to pressure the social media companies to increase censorship of “hate” speech.

 

More

https://www.rt.com/usa/509301-ben-jerrys-social-justice-ice-cream/

Anonymous ID: fa4a18 Dec. 10, 2020, 6:39 p.m. No.11976377   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6545 >>6639 >>6786 >>6891 >>6951 >>6994

World’s richest banker Joseph Safra dies at 82 in Brazil

 

Joseph Safra, the world’s richest banker and Brazil’s richest man, has died aged 82. Safra, descended from a banking family that made a fortune financing camel caravans, was worth a whopping $23 billion.

 

Safra passed away on Thursday of natural causes, according to a statement by Banco Safra, the financial institution that he built with his brother Moise, who died in 2014. Safra also owned the Safra National Bank of New York and the J. Safra Sarasin bank in Switzerland, both of which catered to the ultra-rich.

 

His web of holdings also included a 50 percent share in banana grower Chiquita, and London’s iconic ‘Gherkin’ skyscraper.

 

Forbes Magazine’s 2020 billionaires estimated Safra’s net worth at $23.5 billion, making him the world’s 39th richest person, and Brazil’s richest. He was described by Forbes as the world’s richest banker, a title that now passes to Jorge Paulo Leeman, a Brazilian banking and beverage industry tycoon worth $19.9 billion.

 

Born in Lebanon to Jewish parents, Safra emigrated to Brazil with his father, Jacob, in 1962. His family first became wealthy long beforehand, however, by financing camel caravans in Syria during the days of the Ottoman Empire.

 

Safra is survived by his wife Vicky, four children and 14 grandchildren. His older brother, Edmond, was killed in an arson attack at his Monte Carlo apartment in 1999. Edmond’s nurse was later found guilty of setting the fire and jailed.

 

https://www.rt.com/business/509293-worlds-richest-banker-safra-dies/

Anonymous ID: fa4a18 Dec. 10, 2020, 6:42 p.m. No.11976427   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6639 >>6786 >>6891

Judicial Watch Obtains Emails Which Show Impeachment Star Witness Yovanovitch Warning about Burisma Corruption

 

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it received 210 pages of records from the State Department which show that former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie “Masha” Yovanovitch had specifically warned in 2017 about corruption allegations against Burisma Holdings. During her November 2019 testimony in the impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump, Yovanovitch told lawmakers that she knew little about Burisma.

 

The records were obtained by Judicial Watch in response to a FOIA lawsuit filed in January 2020 seeking records of communications from the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv mentioning Burisma (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:20-cv-00229)).

 

On October 4, 2017, Michael Polt, a former ambassador to Estonia and Serbia and who until October 2020 was Senior Director at the McCain Institute, emailed Yovanovitch regarding the McCain Institute’s plan to conduct leadership development training for Ukrainian prosecutors that would be funded by Burisma. The idea was suggested to Polt by Sally Painter, Burisma’s lobbyist at Blue Star Strategies, and a Burisma executive. In the email, Polt notes that he was introduced to Painter by U.S. special envoy to Ukraine, Kurt Volker. Volker was also a Trump impeachment witness.

 

Polt emails Yovanovitch on October 4, 2017:

 

Dear Masha: Greetings from the home front and all the best for your complex assignment in Kiev! I wonder if I could pick your brain on a leadership development we have been asked to run for Ukrainian public prosecutors here at the McCain Institute. Kurt cannot get involved with this, due to his other role as Special Envoy. Sally Painter of Blue Star Strategies, whom Kurt introduced to me and then stepped aside, together with Vadym Poharskyi of the Burisma Group have asked us whether we could provide a two-week Leadership Development and Professional Capacity Building program for Ukrainian public prosecutors proposed to us by the Ukrainian Chief Prosecutor. Burisma would fun this. We are prepared to do this, as we have done for similar groups from the DRC [Democratic Republic of the Congo] and from Pakistan. I would greatly appreciate your view if you know Burisma and/or Vadym or others.

 

Yovanovitch, in her response, warned Polt about Burisma, writing:

 

Mike: Sorry not to have responded more quickly. I will get back to you with a fuller response, but I would urge caution in dealing with the Burisma Group. It is widely believed that the owner was the beneficiary of the corrupt justice system here and I think –to the extent that anyone is aware that Burisma is funding the training –there would be raised eyebrows in Kyiv over the irony of Burisma training prosecutors and to what end.

 

I’d also note that the PGO [Prosecutor General’s Office] is one of the entities here that remains resolutely unreformed. After a year and a half of trying, we pulled out and reprogrammed our resources into other areas in the justice sector that were ready for change. Wish I had better news and will get back to you with more details.

 

In a November 7, 2017, email to Yovanovitch, Polt indicates that he is taking her “sage advice” and “not moving forward” with Burisma’s funding of the training.

 

During her November 15, 2019, testimony before the House Intelligence Committee in the impeachment proceedings, Yovanovitch said she didn’t have much knowledge about Burisma, and noted that she only learned of its connection to the Biden family through “press reports” she read while preparing for her Senate confirmation hearing.

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/burisma-impeachment-yovanovitch/

Anonymous ID: fa4a18 Dec. 10, 2020, 6:45 p.m. No.11976474   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6490 >>6603 >>6639 >>6779 >>6786 >>6830 >>6891 >>7009 >>7023

Now the Democrat Attorneys General Align with Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia – Nearly Every State Has Picked Sides

 

The Texas case against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia has exploded. Now nearly the entire country is picking sides.

 

The whole country knows now that the state of Texas sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on Monday night in the US Supreme Court challenging their unlawful election procedures.

 

Texas argued these four states violated the US Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions. But these states did not make the changes through the state legislatures as spelled out in the US Constitution.

 

We reported earlier today that President Trump joined Texas in suing the four states being sued by Texas.

 

Now blue states and a couple territories have gotten involved and have joined Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin. They are fine with massive corruption as long as they gain power:

 

Even the Democrat Attorney General from North Carolina, where Trump won the election, has joined with fellow Democrat Attorneys General.

 

In addition to the above, Ohio joined Texas today and Wyoming decided to stay out of it. Iowa, Kentucky, Alaska and Idaho have decided to stay out of the case as well. Nearly the entire country is in the game now. (see above for map).

The number of states and entities joining Texas in their suit against the big four states involved in stealing the 2020 election continues to grow. This case isn’t bogus or seditious, this case is valid and that is why states are picking sides.

 

(A final note – the people of many states must be sick with the actions of their current Democrat officials aligning with the corruption of the left. Never in US history have we seen such an all out effort to steal an election away from the Presidential winner. The steal cannot stand.)

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-now-democrat-attorneys-general-align-pennsylvania-michigan-wisconsin-georgia-nearly-every-state-picked-sides/

Anonymous ID: fa4a18 Dec. 10, 2020, 6:48 p.m. No.11976513   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6524 >>6527 >>6639 >>6786 >>6865 >>6891

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1337208787166380032

 

Ron

@CodeMonkeyZ

Chinese Minister Xu Xueyuan attended Kentucky governor Andy Beshear’s inauguration in 2019.

 

Has Andy Beshear taken CCP money?

We now know Eric Swalwell may have been compromised by CCP sexpionage..

 

Why hasn’t Kentucky joined the Texas election lawsuit?

 

http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/sgxw/t1725094.htm

Anonymous ID: fa4a18 Dec. 10, 2020, 6:51 p.m. No.11976544   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6639 >>6786 >>6891

Ex-Gay Pastor Appeals After Court Rules Section 230 Allows Big Tech to Discriminate Against Him

 

On Thursday, a pastor who previously lived a homosexual lifestyle made his appeal in a unique case regarding discrimination and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), which protects Big Tech companies from liability for the content third-parties post on their platforms. The pastor is suing Vimeo for discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and religion after the platform banned him from publishing videos telling the stories of people who identify as ex-gay.

 

“This is a case of grave importance because it is about whether big tech platforms can unlawfully discriminate against persons based on religion or sexual orientation,” attorney Nada Higuera argued on Thursday in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

Southern California Christian Pastor Jim Domen sued Vimeo, claiming the platform discriminated against him on the basis of his Christian religion and his sexual orientation as a former homosexual. The lower court granted Vimeo’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming Section 230 allowed the company to discriminate against the pastor. This logic echoes a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling along similar lines.

 

“This case is significant because the lower court and the Ninth Circuit have interpreted the federal Communications Decency Act to give immunity to Big Tech whenever such a company commits unconscionable acts of discrimination in their online filtering decisions against protected classes of individuals – for example, classifications based on race, religion, color creed or sexual orientation,” attorney Robert Tyler, Partner at Tyler & Bursch, LLP and President of Advocates for Faith & Freedom, said in a statement.

 

According to Higuera, the lower court’s interpretation of Section 230 allows “a company like Vimeo, YouTube or even Amazon [to] decide that it will not allow someone to hold an account with their site just because they are of a particular race or religion. This invidious discrimination is normally unlawful for businesses operating in any states; but according to this federal district court, the CDA exempts Big Tech from states’ nondiscrimination laws when filtering content or deciding who is allowed to access the service they offer. This should concern everyone from left to right.”

Section 230 May Be a Lifeline for This Conservative Crowdfunding Platform Shut Down by the Government

 

Pastor Domen identifies as a former homosexual who is now married to a woman and has three children. The pastor operated the religious non-profit Church United, posting videos on Vimeo via Church United’s account. Vimeo terminated that account in December 2018, claiming that Church United’s videos “harass, incite hatred, or include discriminatory or defamatory speech.”

 

Vimeo claimed that some of Church United’s 89 videos constituted harassment because Pastor Domen and other ex-gays spoke about the help they received through counseling and talk therapy, the kind of therapy wrongly demonized as “conversion therapy.” The videos in question involved people telling their personal stories about how therapy helped them put their homosexual lifestyles behind them.

 

The lawsuit claims Vimeo removed Church United’s account because the Big Tech company disapproves of Pastor Domen’s sexual orientation and religion.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/12/10/ex-gay-pastor-appeals-after-court-rules-section-230-allows-big-tech-to-discriminate-against-him-n1202661

Anonymous ID: fa4a18 Dec. 10, 2020, 6:54 p.m. No.11976575   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6622 >>6639 >>6786 >>6891

So, Hunter Biden's Laptop Was Real After All, Huh?

 

Hey, did you ever find out about a particular thing that was absolutely, undisputedly, 100% true? Like, no doubt at all? You had ironclad proof and everything? And after you found out about it, did you then run into somebody else who simply refused to believe it, no matter the evidence? Sure, we all know somebody like that. In 2020, it’s practically a hobby. But that’s not a good thing when the person who refuses to acknowledge facts and evidence is supposed to be a journalist.

 

For instance, take Hunter Biden’s laptop. Please! Take it, because CNN and the NYT and the rest of those frauds didn’t want to hear about it before the election. They refused to cover the story, and when they finally had to, they dismissed it.

 

The New York Post broke the story on Oct. 14, and our moral, ethical, and intellectual betters panicked. They knew the story was trouble for Joe Biden, so they straight-up lied about it.

 

 

Flashback: Before the 2nd presidential debate, NBC’s@HallieJackson tried to prep viewers that Trump might bring up Hunter’s laptop, which she claimed “has the hallmarks of a foreign interference campaign” pic.twitter.com/fy4q0KVUvf

 

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 10, 2020

 

According to them, the information was both “hacked” and also, somehow, “Russian disinformation.” When in truth, it was neither. Hunter Biden, an admitted drug abuser, abandoned one of his laptops at a repair shop less than five miles from his father’s home. The laptop is real. The information on it is real. The trouble Hunter finds himself in is real.

 

The NY Post‘s story was censored on Twitter, and the outlet’s Twitter account was suspended. A lot of other Twitter users (including yours truly) were suspended for talking about the story. And now the Delaware computer repairman who stepped forward with hard evidence of Hunter Biden’s misdeeds has been driven into hiding.

 

Can you guess what happened next?

 

Daily Beast:

 

The Seeds of Hunter Biden’s Current Legal Woes Were Found on His Laptop

 

The Justice Department’s announcement on Wednesday that it was investigating Hunter Biden, for what he deemed to be “tax affairs,” took root several years ago with a much broader inquiry that included possible money laundering…

 

Hunter Biden’s business dealings were always a ripe target for President Donald Trump and his allies. But they became the primary focus of their attacks after the president’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani, claimed in the election’s closing weeks to have obtained a copy of the younger Biden’s laptop from a computer repairman in Delaware named John Paul MacIsaac.

 

Oh. So we were right all along. How about that?

 

Sorry to quote myself, but I really nailed this one on Oct. 22:

 

This isn’t about an election, or at least it isn’t for me. It isn’t about who you think should be president for the next four years (or as long as Joe holds up). It’s about national media outlets blatantly refusing to tell you the truth because they think they know who should be president. They don’t think you can make that decision for yourself.

 

Well, they did it. They swept the story under the rug because they knew it was bad for the guy who wanted to replace Trump, and they didn’t care about anything but replacing Trump. They weren’t worried about integrity, reputation, professionalism, or anything else that might have kept them from lying.

 

After all, who’s gonna stop ’em? You? Me? They don’t care about us. All journalists care about is giving each other awards and basking in the praise of their bosses in the Democratic Party.

 

Now they’re doing the same thing with Eric Swalwell. He’s embroiled in a huge scandal, and they’re just pretending it isn’t happening. After all, he has a (D) after his name and they’re team players.

 

I don’t believe the Democrats stole the election. But via their enablers in NYC and Silicon Valley, they covered up the truth about the Biden family to sway the outcome of the election.

 

If you didn’t trust them before Election Day, all they’ve done is prove you right. And now they’ll hate you even more for it.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/jim-treacher/2020/12/10/so-hunter-bidens-laptop-was-real-after-all-huh-n1202565

Anonymous ID: fa4a18 Dec. 10, 2020, 7:03 p.m. No.11976703   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6786 >>6796 >>6891

TRUMP v. BIDEN: The United States Supreme Court Must Uphold the Rule of Law

 

An Open Letter to the United States Supreme Court

 

Supreme Court of the United States

1 First Street, NE

Washington, DC 20543

 

Honorable Justices of the United States Supreme Court:

 

We write this letter to all nine SCOTUS justices with great urgency and in the interest of preserving the American Republic.

 

As each of you knows by now, the 2020 POTUS election was outright stolen by the Democrat Party headed by Joe Biden.

 

The volume of hard evidence of this election theft is unparalleled in U.S. history as well as overwhelming in its scope and magnitude.

 

In point of fact, the definitive and proven pattern of voter fraud, election rigging and electoral theft conclusively demonstrates a highly premeditated criminal conspiracy at work.

 

Because of the extraordinary depth and breadth of this Democrat-run criminal enterprise, it has become evident that the on-the-ground perpetrators worked within a highly organized international crime syndicate. And, that stealing this election from Donald Trump for Joe Biden was undertaken with purposeful design and great determination.

 

Given the resulting grave state of affairs in these United States of America, and especially in light of the highly consequential outcome of such a nationwide crime spree committed against the American people, the SCOTUS is compelled to exercise “Original Jurisdiction” over this federal case.

 

The stark reality of the outright subversion of the 2020 election by the Democrat Party is such that, if the SCOTUS does not agree to hear the case of election fraud as defined by “Original Jurisdiction”, the nation will undoubtedly be plunged into an unprecedented constitutional crisis of truly epic proportions.

 

Therefore, the purpose of this urgent open letter is to compel the SCOTUS to hear this case with all deliberate speed. Obviously, there are those lawsuits in the key battleground states that will wend their way onto the SCOTUS docket. However, we are not writing about those obviously meritorious lawsuits.

 

We are much more concerned with the settled law, by the U.S. Supreme Court, which clearly states that “FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING”.

 

In view of the pervasive and profound criminal fraud conducted in the process of perpetrating this felony election theft, it’s apparent the there was an inordinate degree of mens rea on the part of all the co-conspirators involved—from the very top decision-makers of the RICO-level crime syndicate to those fraudsters who pre-filled out the bogus ballots by the thousands with Biden’s name selected.

 

The sheer size and complexity of the Democrat’s criminal operation demonstrated a highly premeditated scheme to steal this election by way of wanton fraud and statewide corruption. When all the different types of fraudulent conduct are considered in the aggregate, this conspiratorial plot was, at once, reckless to the extreme, transparently brazen, and surely a sign of utmost desperation on the part of the Biden-Harris ticket.

 

It could even be postulated that Trump was really robbed of his decisive mandate conferred by what would have been his overwhelming landslide victory, rather than of the election win itself.

 

Therefore, there can be one, and only one, basis for any ruling in regard to Trump v. Biden (which is also We the People v. Joe Biden, Kamala Harris & Democrat Party) and that is: “FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING”. As follows:

 

Respectfully,

 

One of Millions of Aggrieved American Voters

 

Action Plan for Patriots

 

Please, everyone, email this open letter directly to the U.S. Supreme Court using their contact link posted below. Also, email it to your elected representatives and government at every level—thank you!

https://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspx

 

http://stateofthenation.co/?p=40529