>>11985290

I agree with you in many respects. But we have a fundamental challenge, which is at its root metaphysical, ethical, and epistemological: what is “good” and how do we know that something is good. You are presuming that there is some concurrence regarding those questions, such that there might be general agreement as to what is poisonous and what is salutary.

I don’t believe that such general agreement exists, because neither the standards of determination nor the nature of relevant data to make value judgments are generally shared by our population. The absence of common values makes reaching consensus over right and wrong, good and evil, no longer practicable or possible.

I think we have reached a point where a national divorce is both beneficial and necessary. The only means of demonstrating who is right and who is wrong, at least in terms of human society as a whole, is to run these diametrically opposed world views side by side

>>11985469

Why did you post this?

>>11985493

There were extremely few domestic slaves in Britain itself at any time prior to the abolition of slavery.

Non white people were rare in Britain until the 1960s, when people from former Empire dominions (principally the Caribbean and Indian Subcontinent) were given the opportunity to immigrate to the UK. These immigrants were granted citizenship and all the attendant rights inherent in that status. The white British took a while to adjust - the experience of the ‘70s would make young people today highly uncomfortable. But from the end of that decade, Britain started to adjust as most of the early immigrants integrated well, and their children were British in outlook. Intermarriage has been a common phenomenon.

Social cohesion has become worse since 2000 because of the sheer numbers of new immigrants, the competition for public housing, and the increasing tendency of newer immigrants to form parallel societies. The Establishment has also increasingly forced the “woke” agenda and positive discrimination down the throats of everyone. The backlash against this - and in particular against the BBC - continues to build.