>>11987339 (/lb)
It doesn't take a jew to reject muhjoo.
You're pushing a false choice.
I'm not black, but I will defend against attacks that target a person's blackness.
I'm not a Jew, but I will defend against attacks that target a person's Jewness.
You make it seem like it is illegal or wrong for anyone to defend anyone 'different' from them
You didn't 'catch' anyone or anything on an Anonymous board.
It doesn't take a jew to reject muhjoo.
You're pushing a false choice.
I'm not black, but I will defend against attacks that target a person's blackness.
I'm not a Jew, but I will defend against attacks that target a person's Jewness.
You make it seem like it is illegal or wrong for anyone to defend anyone 'different' from them
Military.
I am loving the fakers playing both sides, posting Mr. Pig memes and anti Mr. Pig memes.
False dichotomy
ya know Anons, I have to agree with SCOTUS.
Texas filed suit, but the state of Texas was not harmed by the 4 states' election fraud.
The law says plaintiffs have to be victims of harm.
The country was harmed, the people were harmed, but Texas wasn't.
What Texas did was play the role of the state SHOWING that the military is indeed the only way.
I guess I assumed so before today, but the more I think about it the more I can see that states are pretty much independent from each other. Fraud in one state doesn't stand as victimizing the people of another state, even though going up to federal and then back down to state does harm, if the federal part is harmed.
If SCOTUS argues the Texas case is dismissed because Texas wasn't harmed by the 4 election fraud states, can't Trump file an emergency suit as he was most definitely harmed?
You sound…skeered.