What is a POTUS to do, Q?

Q:

What authority does POTUS have specifically over the Marines?

The Marines are the only branch of service that falls directly under executive command

10 U.S. Code § 8063 - United States Marine Corps: composition; functions

In addition, the Marine Corps shall provide detachments and organizations for service on armed vessels of the Navy, shall provide security detachments for the protection of naval property at naval stations and bases, and shall perform such other duties as the President may direct. However, these additional duties may not detract from or interfere with the operations for which the Marine Corps is primarily organized.

Focus on the power of POTUS as it relates to the Marines.

The National Security Act of 1947, amended in 1952, specifies the duties of the USMC to include: "perform such other duties as the president may direct."

Anons knew this years ago. We can help. Just be kind.

'But what about possie … whatever?'

>>11988233

https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/p/posse-comitatus-act-and-related-matters-a-sketch.html

The Posse Comitatus Act does not apply where Congress has expressly authorized use of the military to execute the law. Congress has done so in three ways, by giving a branch of the armed forces civilian law enforcement authority, by establishing general rules for certain types of assistance, and by addressing individual cases and circumstances with more narrowly crafted legislation. Thus it has vested the Coast Guard, a branch of the armed forces, with broad law enforcement responsibilities. Second, over the years it has passed a fairly extensive array of particularized statutes, like those permitting the President to call out the armed forces in times of insurrection and domestic violence, 10 U.S.C. §§ 331-335. Finally, it has enacted general legislation authorizing the armed forces to share information and equipment with civilian law enforcement agencies, 10 U.S.C. §§ 371-382.

The legislation contains both explicit grants of authority and restrictions on the use of that authority for military assistance to the police federal, state and local particularly in the form of information and equipment, 10 U.S.C. §§ 371-382. Section 371 specifically authorizes the armed forces to share information acquired during military operations and in fact encourages the armed forces to plan their activities with an eye to the production of incidental civilian benefits. The section allows the use of military undercover agents and the collection of intelligence concerning civilian activities only where there is a nexus to an underlying military purpose. Under sections 372 through 374, military equipment and facilities may be made available to civilian authorities; members of the armed forces may train civilian police on the operation and maintenance of equipment and may provide them with expert advice; and military personnel may be employed to maintain and operate the equipment supplied.

Will our active duty military have help Q? We're clutching our pearls here …

>>11988293

Q: Well, who controls the NG?

10 U.S. Code § 12406 - National Guard in Federal service: call

Whenever—

(1)the United States, or any of the Commonwealths or possessions, is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation;

(2)there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or

(3)the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States;

the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.

But! can the NG work with the USMC, Mr. Q?

>>11988360

The Marines will accomplish their objective no matter the obstacle.

(Seriously, no disrespect intended. I've read a lot about the USMC and NG.Love and respect.)

https://www.marforres.marines.mil/Marine-Reserve-News-Photos/Marine-Reserve-News/Article/521818/marines-army-national-guard-working-together-again/

Between 2011 and 2012, no unit flew more medical evacuation missions for Marines than Company C, 1st Battalion, 171st Aviation Regiment, of the New Mexico Army National Guard.

>>11988464

Is this really happening, Q?

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: EV3pI+ol No.149401052 📁

Nov 14 2017 12:51:10 (EST)

How do you capture a very dangerous animal?

Do you attack it from the front?

Do you walk through the front door?

Do you signal ahead of time you will be attacking?

How do you distinguish between good and bad?

Who do you trust to keep secrets?

How do you prevent leaks?

Who do you trust to complete the mission?

How do you prevent warnings being sent?

Why is Adm R. so important?

Why was the source code to former NSA collection p’s publicly released?

How do you blind the Clowns In America?

From anon:

Wikipedia article on the Insurrection Act of 1807:

There are Constitutional exceptions to Posse Comitatus restrictions rooted in the President's own constitutional authority. Defense Department guidelines describe "homeland defense" as a "constitutional exception" to Posse Comitatus restriction, meaning that measures necessary to guarantee National Security from external threats are not subject to the same limitations.

The 1807 Act has been modified twice. In 1861, a new section was added allowing the federal government to use the National Guard and armed forces against the will of the state government in the case of "rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States," in anticipation of continued unrest after the Civil War.[4] In 1871, the Third Enforcement Act revised this section (§ 253) to protect Black Americans from attacks by the Ku Klux Klan. The language added at that time allows the federal government to use the act to enforce the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[

>>11988530

tl:dr not important? Try this:

In 1861, a new section was added allowing the federal government to use the National Guard and armed forces against the will of the state government in the case of "rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States," in anticipation of continued unrest after the Civil War.[4] In 1871, the Third Enforcement Act revised this section (§ 253) to protect Black Americans from attacks by the Ku Klux Klan. The language added at that time allows the federal government to use the act to enforce the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Simpler?

"The language added at that time allows the federal government to use the act to enforce the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution."

>>11988607

How long has this been planned? It must have taken years just to finalize and get prepared, Q. Seriously?

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 28b403 No.4400956 📁

Dec 20 2018 21:02:56 (EST)

Rogers departure. Intel.

Sessions departure. Law.

Kelly departure. Warfare/MIL

Mattis departure. Warfare/MIL

Notice a pattern?

Q

>>11988767

Nǐ hǎo