Anonymous ID: 024c0f Dec. 11, 2020, 7:05 p.m. No.11990266   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0431

>>11989902

 

>If the SC saw clear evidence of treason from that, they can't proceed, because of article 3. Militairy court should take over.

 

Wouldnโ€™t the SC have said they donโ€™t have standing? Not Texas doesnโ€™t have standing?