Anonymous ID: 5aaf93 Dec. 11, 2020, 6:41 p.m. No.11989870   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>11989798

This makes sense. Why take the case if you're just going to kick it?

 

I don't trust anyone but POTUS these days.

If I knew who Q was, I'd trust them.

But POTUS's plan this whole time seems to be to shine light on people - get them close to him - get them attention, and then BOOM. They are traitors.

Anonymous ID: 5aaf93 Dec. 11, 2020, 6:45 p.m. No.11989933   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9972 >>0136

Treason Clause

 

To further guard against the prospect that the government could use false or passion-driven accusations of treason to undermine political opponents, the Treason Clause provides that the offense may only be proven by “open confession in court,” or on “the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act.” The “overt act” requirement was designed both to limit the kind of substantive behavior treason could punish—only conduct, not mere expression—and to ensure that the conduct itself demonstrated a defendant’s intention to betray the United States. Believing that no witness could meaningfully testify to a defendant’s internal state of mind, the Cramer Court made clear that the defendant’s disloyal intent must be evident from the witnessed acts themselves; the government would have to prove that each overt act alleged “actually gave aid and comfort to the enemy.” The two-witness requirement was likewise geared to raising the bar to prosecution, applying “at least to all acts of the defendant which are used to draw incriminating inferences that aid and comfort have been given.” While there was no dispute in Cramer’s case that he had met with a man who turned out to be a German soldier in the United States, the Court concluded that these facts alone failed to establish Cramer had actually given that enemy soldier aid and comfort. The Court accordingly reversed Cramer’s treason conviction.

 

https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretation/article-iii/clauses/39

Anonymous ID: 5aaf93 Dec. 11, 2020, 6:59 p.m. No.11990146   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0278

>>11990044

I sorta think this too.

Listen - this vaccine, the way they portray it in the MSM - is fucking ludicrous.

 

mRNA? Are you fucking kidding me?

 

THE WHOLE IDEA IS INSANE.

I have MS in toxicology. This is fucking CRAZY.

It cannot be real.

It's literally genetic manipulation.