>>11989703 (/lb)
>the electoral college will vote for biden
Is that from the article?
Yes because he later said the number was 25
Explain
Right so there must have been a reason for the 'mistaken' 26.
Why should they?
In other words, you're not sure.
Don't you recall the 'faithless electors' 2016?
It doesn't say SCOTUS can't rule on Treason.
Have you ever learned statistics, probability, mathematics?
Doesn't seem so, because Q was proven legit by Mathematical Probability.
You can't compete with that, so no use sitting there with your neckbeard envisioning others to be you.
You're not very good at coping.
Nah, he said Pfizer.
Since when did you put your LIFE on the line for total strangers?
Until you do, you have nothing on Q.