TYB
Thanks for posting early dipshit
Truth
I've been here every day for years, need to step up and do my part. I use TOR though, so, will have to change it up.
>>11990440 (lb)
>The SC threw out the Texas case because it did not want to get involved.
THIS is the bullshit that POTUS wants to put to an end.
fuck this two tiered, biased, hurt muh feelings justice.
If it is wrong, then it needs to be addressed without EXCUSES because our justice system FAILS if it does not act in accordance to the law.
fuck every single traitorous cop out wanna be leader in this nation…let them eat cake!
Justice is coming
/rant off/
I'm with you anon, the shit is thick though. We need something, anything at this point. This anon is worn out, but, wants to step up and continue the fight.
Article III denial for an Article II appeal for relief because of lack of standing.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-3/
I'm comfy as fuck. "No standing"!
Kek!
Let's move on to Part 3, shall we?
>dismissed by SCOTUS solely on the basis that they believed Texas does not have standing,
are you a retard? because last time i checked, the law is the law. they refused 7-2.
that is a failure to execute the law!
i don't care if another case gets a win, this case that was rejected was still a violation of law.
Under Article III. Do pay attention.
Yes, and I repeat myself. Under Article III, it's Part 3 that counts
checked
they ignored that a law was broken
No, they told Texas exactly what, under the Constitution, that they felt was violated, under Article III, where Texas had NO Standing to ask them for relief.
Now under the US Code of Military Justice, that's a whole nother court system, which covers a particular part of Article III. That is Part 3.
okay, with that logic i can rob a store with a robot but because the robot was not titled in my name i get away with the crime?
please help this dumb anon because the filings i read outlined a violation of Texas voters loss of electors by states that knowingly cheated.
adjudicates, agggghhhh
I agree totally, fren. SCOTUS denied case because of a lack of Standing under Article III, yet Texas, et al, appeal was under Article II.
SCOTUS has laid down the first step on the map. By Article III it shall be.
Thank you anon, really. Just cracked a cold one and trying to enjoy this Friday night with you all. Cheers!
We tried to go to the White House as a group and got surrounded by Antifa trying to start shit. Police were all around us and just let them do their thing instead of intervening.
LOL, this is our group of Patriots getting harrrased by those faggots
oh okay. that actually did make sense. they did not have a cause to the theft because they were neither the victim or the perpetrator.
you just lowered my blood pressure by 20 basis points
thank you
Scroll down for "Prayer For Relief", it's definitely under Article II.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/12/texas-sues-pennsylvania-georgia-michigan-and-wisconsin-in-u-s-supreme-court-to-have-legislatures-appoint-electors/
Yep, about an hour ago. We tried to walk to the WH and we turned off I street to 16th and they swarmed us.
Fer years ppl been sayin "dont say that. you cant say that. you'll get us shut down".
Can I say it now anons? Or will I get shushed again?
Here it is: This is ALREADY war. It's time to fucking end some lives. Clean your guns and prepare yourselves to kill bad people.
Our families are no longer safe. Time to send 'em all to the great sorter of souls and then think no more of them.
I know im not the only one preparing and training for this for years.
Or US citizens acting in concert for and with foreign actors. That's where you get Part 3 violations, and the ENTIRE SCOTUS has signaled they know it when they see it.
And oh man is that a fucking plan….
Without incident. My buddy with me was telling them they need to quit being brainwashed by the media and realize they are being used. They were slightly confused by that.
Kek!
Nope, this is all smoke for others to "Find The Red Queen".
Dec. 11 to Jan 20 = 40 days, 40 nights…. biblical numbers….
I'm looking into it anon, afraid I'll shit the bread, but I will learn.
I understand friend, just gotta make the move
Dec. 11 - Jan20 = 40 days, 40 nights… biblical
I'm not ready yet, gotta do some test bakes
>>BAKER<<
Alito and Thomas note that Texas has no standing under Article 3, whereas Texas sued for relief under Article 2.
Here's Article 3: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-3/
It has 3 parts, and one is more important than the other two.
Haven't you learned yet that even if POTUS proves with hard evidence, the courts are corrupt and will rule against it with some bullshit argument that the complaint has no standing? The time is pretty damn near for an alternative response other than playing by the "rules". If the other group of people are not willing to stand up against their cheating leaders, then they wont stand up now. The courts are dead even with proof. Banana republic we are, until we are not.
My ID is not reporting my posts correctly. More like the number of posts I actually read.
The DD website was a game, trying to be like the ARGs that were popular at the time. It was weird,
and they slow-rolled the pieces of the puzzle. Not sure if I ever finished it. The movie was equally strange.
Because SCOTUS pointed all to Article 3 as the route to victory..
spoken like a true anon
Article III, Part 3, is adjudicated under the US Military Code of Justice, not SCOTUS.
KEK….you people never cease to amaze me. This is stretched so thin that's it's fkn comical. Warp speed is a retard name given to everything that happens quicker than it should. There's no secret code in it. It literally is telling us that they are pushing the vaccine through faster than usual. KEKEK You fucking people are pathetic as fuck.