Tracy Beanz is absolutely right.

The Texas lawsuitwas not part of the original plan and came out of nowhere.

Just because a surprise lawsuit was dismissed by SCOTUS solely on the basis that they believed Texas does not have standing, HAS ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING on ANY of the other massive plans ongoing, nor on whether there was fraud or not (there was).

The fact that shills flooded this site with fear pron as soon as the SCOTUS decision came down, asserting FALSE statements that it's all over, Trump lost, SCOTUS 'comped', on and on and on…IT'S ALL FAKE, ALL FAKE NARRATIVE, ALL TO DISCOURAGE AND DISSUADE.

I AM HOLDING THE LINE, PATRIOTS, JOIN ME AND I'LL JOIN WITH YOU!

>>11990521

>>11990624

False, what it shows is ONLY what THEY WROTE IN THEIR OPINION.

What they wrote is that Texas has no standing in the case. That's it. Texas filed suit, and SCOTUS ruled that Texas has no standing so SCOTUS will not hear TEXAS' case.

That's it.

It does not 'show' anything else.

>>11990672

Don't pretend that the hype by POTUS was somehow POTUS asserting or suggesting or implying that the Texas case was the 'last stand'.

Anons focused on it because it showed which states are in and which are out.

It was an incredibly valuable learning experience.

SCOTUS could NOT have 'easily taken the case', because one of the most important criteria is STANDING.

Texas, they ruled, had no standing.

OK, fine, Texas has no standing.

This has NOTHING TO DO with THE PLAN, because Texas came out of nowhere with this suit. If Texas never filed, we'd be in the same place we are now, LESS all the knowledge we learned from which states joined with Texas and which joined the 4 election fraud states.

Optics? I don't think so.

>>11990728

Nothing you said contradicted a single statement I wrote.

It is a FACT that SCOTUS dismissed the suit by Texas SOLELY on the basis that SCOTUS believes Texas has no standing in the case.

They did not rule there was no fraud.

They did not rule Biden won.

They did not rule everything else going to SCOTUS has been dismissed.

This Texas lawsuit was NOT the 'last stand'. It was a SURPRISE lawsuit that had nothing to do with POTUS, Rudy, Jenna, Powell, or Q.

>>11990753

Go fuck yourself.

>>11990754

You idiot.

>>11990756

Why did you post a meme of Powell with devil horns?

>>11990804

No, they did not ignore that.

In order to even HEAR a case, it must pass the threshold of there being a victim with standing.

SCOTUS only ruled that since Texas has no standing, they won't hear their case.

That's it. They did not assert there was no fraud.

>>11990798

Because Patriots never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever not once ever ever lose a single battle in a long war?

>>11990829

And 18 other states.

>>11990834

LEARN

https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1337548142196129792

>>11990849

Go fuck yourself.

>>11990867

It means, using your example, that if you robbed a store with a robot, and I am neither a party to your crime nor am I the store owner, that should I submit a lawsuit to the court, accusing you of a crime, I would get my case dismissed because I have no standing.

That says nothing about the store owner's case against you. If they sue you, they would have standing, because it wad they who were robbed.

Make sense?

>>11990898

Because she's awesome.

>>11991089

16 go fuck yourself too.