>Did the US Supreme Court just cross the rubicon and commit treason???
I personally don't think so, but I'm not a constitutional lawyer.
wow. Rule 34. Tis true!
faque unt ghey, sadly.
Do you have sauce on the original complaint that specifies Article II as the stated standing?
There are Article III references, but I believe you are correct.
This would appear to be YUGE…SCOTUS kicked this out because foreign involvement in an election would fall under Article III.
Yikes!
Hm….I just read Article III again. It does appear that SCOTUS should have heard the case unless there are Article III violations that are verboten under a classified investigation. Could they have just not wanted to mention this – or been unable to?
11991199