>https://qanon.news/Q
it show Durham as the last Q Post
its not up to date
>>11990251 (lb)
>>11990298 (lb)
on it's face, by setting aside their oath to the Constitution, it looks like the US Supreme Court may have committed the ultimate act of treason.
frightening thought that they could have doomed the US to civil war.
which begs the question: Did the US Supreme Court just cross the rubicon and commit treason???
o7
Don't look at the WEF/Great Reset
many of us are still here anon. there's no doubt, hope and faith is razor thin at the moment, however i do recall, God generally intervenes, when all hope seems to be lost.
all i can do is pray, Gods will, not mine, be done.
sure looks like justices just shit on the Constitution.
Trump’s Legal Team Considering Alternate Options After Supreme Court Rejects Texas Election Suit
December 11, 2020
Attorneys on President Donald Trump’s legal team, Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, shared on Friday that the team is considering filing separate lawsuits to district courts in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s rejection of a lawsuit from Texas to challenge the 2020 election results in four battleground states. The two attorneys also called for courage from the courts to allow hearings on the lawsuits.
Justices on the nation’s highest court late Friday denied the Lone Star state’s request to sue Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin. They opined that Texas lacked legal standing—or capability—to sue under the Constitution because it has not shown a valid interest to intervene in how other states handle their elections.
In an interview with Newsmax, Giuliani called the court’s decision a “terrible terrible mistake.”
“Basically the courts are saying they want to stay out of this, they don’t want to give us a hearing, they don’t want the American people to hear the facts,” the former New York City mayor said. “These facts will remain an open sore in our history unless they get resolved. They need to be heard they need to be aired and somebody needs to make a decision on whether they’re true or false. And some courts are going to have to have the courage to make that decision.”
“The case wasn’t rejected on the merits the case was rejected on standing,” Giuliani said. “The answer to that is to bring the case now to the district court by the president by some of electors alleging the same facts where there would be standing and therefore get a hearing.”
“There’s nothing that prevents us from filing these cases immediately in the district court, in which the president would have standing,” he continued. “Some of the electors would have standing in that their constitutional rights have been violated.”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trumps-legal-team-considering-alternate-options-after-supreme-court-rejects-texas-election-suit_3615140.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-11-6
their handlers need them to slam in front of the public bc muh corona 'vaccine' isn't selling.