Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 12:35 a.m. No.11992938   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3008 >>3015 >>3086

>>11992087 pb

>widespread poverty, evictions, bankruptcies, homeless, crime, hyperinflation, biden

>

>lots to look forward to in 2021

You have to show them what the Dem Presidency entails …. losing the P_elec was always the goal …. Special Counsel Durham will impeach Biden … and then POTUS is back. the Plan?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 12:43 a.m. No.11992993   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11991760 pb

>FDA APPROVES PFIZER VACCINE FOR EMERGENCY USE!!!

>

>https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1337632918869569537

 

PFIZER/FISA WORKS BOTH WAYS AND TAKES DOWN THE HOUSE

Supreme [C]ourt before [D]eclass

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 12:48 a.m. No.11993022   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11992820 pb

>He honestly puts a lot of hype in things lately, he has made claims that are false

>Leaves 8kun

>Boards go to shit, he doesn't care

>On a never ending rant versus Parler

>Tells people to become familiar with image boards

>This means he is about to release his Project Odin and he is salivating at being in control. Also diminished his image by asking a reporter for nudes when we're supposed to be fighting against sexual predators

>He's honestly acting like a control freak lately

 

8kun has one of the worst design i've ever seen on a discussion board.

Don't know why he was attacking Parlor on the technical front.

Some of the problems here are so simple they can be fixed in minutes to hours.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 12:51 a.m. No.11993034   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3445 >>3465 >>3511 >>3597

Military Patriot and Qanon follower who lost GOP race for Congress is charged with child pornography!

 

maybe because he visited Q Research board?!?

 

AN airman and Qanon follower who lost a Republican race for Congress in November has been charged with child pornography.

 

Ben Gibson, 34, was booked on Wednesday morning for allegedly engaging in pornography involving minors under the age of 13, the Bossier Parish Sheriff’s Office said.

Ben Gibson was arrested on Wednesday and charged with four counts of child pornography

Gibson ran as a Republican in the November 3 election against Rep Mike Johnson, for the seat of Louisiana's 4th Congressional District.

 

The 34-year-old, an active Airman at Barksdale Air Force Base, garnered just 6.3 percent of votes, and came in last behind Democrats Kenny Houston and Ryan Trundle.

 

Gibson has repeatedly made references to Qanon on Facebook, using hashtags popular with the movement on both his personal and campaign accounts.

 

The Qanon conspiracy alleges that President Donald Trump is secretly battling a Satanic group of child-eating Democrat pedophiles and that "Q," a military intelligence officer, is leaking details about the fight online.

 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13453279/airman-who-lost-gop-race-arrested/

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 1:15 a.m. No.11993135   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3170

>>11993074

>BREAKING: results of dominion machine audit VERY troubling

 

Doesn't matter.

If the FBI etc don't care.

If the state courts don't care.

If the federal courts don't care.

And the military doesn't do anything.

And POTUS tweets "the Biden Administration"

What is the point?

Q doesn't even bother to show up knowing we're waiting for him.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 1:30 a.m. No.11993213   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3223

>>11993170

>Put on your big boy pants, anon. We are ALL weary, but we cannot stop fighting. Not now. Not ever.

 

How do you 'fight'?

Post messages online?

 

Politicians are dirty I know.

Courts are cowards I know.

But the military?

Where are they?

All for show?

 

They took an oath to protect the people.

What are they doing?

 

If Biden wins.

China takes over.

Everyone will be injected with DNA modifying poison.

Remaining patriots will be exterminated.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 1:48 a.m. No.11993296   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3329

>>11993279

>Wow! 10 months into this and you still don't know how things work. POTUS and the military don't "watch" who goes into nursing homes and who lives and dies in those facilities. How about you do some research and find out who signed off on those death warrants. You must be from Canada.

 

Stop playing law games and look at the reality.

 

It happened on Trump and his military's watch.

 

Anyone prosecuted yet?

 

What's being done about it?

 

Nothing.

 

Just how much control do patriots actually have?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 2:01 a.m. No.11993353   🗄️.is 🔗kun

What was the plan again?

They still cheated on their watch.

 

4455

Jun 11, 2020 11:46:01 AM EDT

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 2f69ee No. 9574475

 

"We began the ability for us to defend the presidential elections not today, not six months from now. We began it the day after the midterm elections" General Paul Nakasone. Find out how we've been working to protect the 2020 presidential election:

EaPHMwtXkAAxn7Z.jpg

 

EaKQ6OHWkAMxCtD.png

 

What happens when [D]s can no longer cheat electronically?

Push vote-by-MAIL?

What 'event' was necessary to provide cover for push?

Q

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 2:37 a.m. No.11993492   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Canada Today – Invaded by Chinese Troops

by TrueBlue Observer|Published April 30, 2020|28 comments

 

“Maybe they’re finally getting rid of us”: Two Seconds to Midnight in the Downtown East Side

by Kevin D. Annett

 

How long before we see the same here in Australia?

 

The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) has taken a more aggressive approach than other federal departments to the global pandemic (sic) … As the force that must be ready at all times to conduct military operations, at home and abroad, the CAF has a responsibility to enforce health protection measures. – April 17, 2020 Press Statement issued by the Canadian Armed Forces regarding Operation Laser, a contingency plan for deployment in response to a global pandemic

 

Under the terms of the Foreign Investment Protection Act (FIPA), a bi-lateral treaty ratified with China by the Trudeau government in 2019, Chinese security forces can be stationed on Canadian soil to protect vital Chinese investments, without the knowledge or consent of local authorities. – Canadian Independent Press Review, January 15, 2020

 

What’s the panic? They been doing this kind of shit to us for years. So maybe they’re finally getting rid of us. Doesn’t surprise me none. I had a target sign put on me the day I was born an Indian in this country. – Frank Erminseskin, Cree Nation, Hastings street resident, Vancouver

https://cirnow.com.au/canada-today-invaded-by-chinese-troops/

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 2:46 a.m. No.11993528   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation are owned by GOOGLE

 

https://thenationalpulse.com/culture/exclusive-googles-conservative-lobbyists-influencer-list/

permalink save report block reply

 

Apparently the three SC justices Trump nominated were part of the Federalist Society, but I haven't confirmed personally.

 

Edit: Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett have pages on their website, seem to be contributors; to be fair, Alito and Thomas are also contributors, so they might do events with all SC justices. https://fedsoc.org/search?term=gorsuch https://fedsoc.org/search?term=Kavanaugh https://fedsoc.org/search?term=amy+barrett

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 2:47 a.m. No.11993536   🗄️.is 🔗kun

You are the new now!!

 

QAnon: Outlandish conspiracy theory or dangerous global cult?

It has grown from one single cryptic posting about Trump saving the world from paedophiles to the world’s biggest conspiracy theory

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/12/qanon-outlandish-conspiracy-theory-dangerous-global-cult/

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 12, 2020, 2:54 a.m. No.11993563   🗄️.is 🔗kun

On SCOTUS (from a lawyer)

https://thedonald.win/p/11R4JGEHkU/on-scotus-from-a-lawyer/

 

posted 9 hours ago by TheNixonTapes +7535 / -10

 

Things are not over. But let me put SCOTUS into perspective.

 

Yes, GA, PA, MI, and WI, all violated the Constitution. All serious people concur with that assessment. But standing, objectively, was going to be difficult to assert. Texas did make a pretty creative argument, to be sure. Standing was sort of 50-50 given there is literally no precedent for this type of suit. We must commend those who stood with us, even against the odds. Everyone else, fuck 'em.

 

===

 

Apart from the Texas suit, you must keep in mind all election-related lawsuits can be distinguished by the the stage during the election period they are brought, the parties bringing them, and the court in which they are brought.

 

There are three defined stages to this fight: (A) pre-election litigation; (B) post-election, pre-certification litigation; and (C) post-election, post-certification litigation.

 

The parties relevant for our purposes are (1) POTUS in his personal capacity/Trump campaign and (2) all other third parties (e.g., state-level GOP, private citizens, such as Sidney P and L. Wood and their plaintiffs, etc.).

 

The courts are obviously distinguished between State (S) and Federal (F).

 

[I will occasionally combine these alphanumeric references to discuss particular litigation strategies. For example, a reference to an (A-1-F) lawsuit would reference a pre-election lawsuit (A) brought by POTUS (1) in Federal court (F).]

 

Most of the attention-grabbing litigation has been post-election, pre-certification lawsuits brought by third parties in Federal court (B-2-F). From a strategy standpoint, these suits puzzled me.

 

First, Federal court was always less desirable of a venue than State court, because Federal courts almost never intervene in post-election matters. (The only exception to that general rule is an appeal from a state court of last resort to SCOTUS, such as Bush v. Gore.)

 

Second, these (B-2-F) lawsuits sought to enjoin certification of the state election results. I am unaware of any court ever granting this type of relief. The reason no such relief has ever been granted is because the laws of almost every state require certification of results before one can file an election contest in court. (Some states also require certification as a condition precedent to requesting a recount and/or for an automatic recount to occur.)

 

While POTUS did attempt to stop PA and MI certifications, several factors diminished the feasibility of those suits as time progressed, a subject which I do not discuss here.

 

The key lawsuits to watch have always been the election contests.

 

First, an election contest was how Bush v. Gore got to SCOTUS, which demonstrates how these types of lawsuits present a more plausible path to SCOTUS review.

 

Second, standing is almost never a problem, because most state statutes only permit the candidates to bring election contests. The candidate always meets the three key requirements of standing (injury in fact, causation, and redressability).

 

Third, election contests must be brought in state court. Another issue with Federal court is that many of the arguments in the post-election lawsuits have focused on violations of state law. Federal courts do not interpret state law, cannot be called upon to enforce state law, and do not remedy violations of state law. The only time a Federal court examines a state law is when the court is examining whether the state law violates the Federal constitution.

 

Fourth, and this is the good part, POTUS has at least four active election contests that have been filed sort of under the radar:

 

-There is one in Wisconsin (10 EV), which the Wisconsin supreme court is set to hear tomorrow.

 

-There is one in Georgia (16 EV), which has a better chance of success than Sidney P or Lin Wood's suits, precisely because POTUS is a party to this suit, suing in his personal capacity.

 

-There is one in Nevada (6 EV), which the NV supreme court rejected, making it now prime for appeal to the SCOTUS.

 

-There is another one in Arizona (11 EV), which the AZ supreme court rejected, and which AZ GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward said they were appealing to SCOTUS.

 

===

 

I would be lying to you all if I said this was not an uphill battle. It always has been. And I am always cognizant of us not turning into the "here's how Bernie can still win" type of people from 2016. But objectively speaking, it is still not over.

 

And I will say…

 

WE DESERVE OUR DAY IN COURT GODDAMMIT!