Anonymous ID: bf8674 Dec. 12, 2020, 8:34 a.m. No.11995818   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5825 >>5849 >>5881 >>5920 >>5930 >>6024 >>6046

All three of President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court appointees — Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett — joined Chief Justice John Roberts and the three liberal justices in declining to hear Texas v. Pennsylvania.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/11/all-3-trump-supreme-court-appointees-decline-texas-election-case/

Anonymous ID: bf8674 Dec. 12, 2020, 9 a.m. No.11996128   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11996030

 

Standing

 

The legally protectible stake or interest that an individual has in a dispute that entitles him to bring the controversy before the court to obtain judicial relief.

 

Standing, sometimes referred to as standing to sue, is the name of the federal law doctrine that focuses on whether a prospective plaintiff can show that some personal legal interest has been invaded by the defendant. It is not enough that a person is merely interested as a member of the general public in the resolution of the dispute. The person must have a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy.

 

The standing doctrine is derived from the U.S. Constitution's Article III provision that federal courts have the power to hear "cases" arising under federal law and "controversies" involving certain types of parties. In the most fundamental application of the philosophy of judicial restraint, the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted this language to forbid the rendering of advisory opinions.

 

More here:

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/standing