Cope.
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
Confirmed, you're triggered.
Cope.
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You mad.
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
Confirmed you're triggered.
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
Cope cope cope cope cope.
Jan 20 is the deadline, that is the only one in the Constitution.
All previous 'deadlines' are not at all 'final' or 'binding'.
Even if Dec 14 electors vote Biden, there is still over a month after that for sthtf
He's got a point.
How can you prove in court the merits of your case if the court says you have no 'standing' to even make your case?
You idiot.
What power does the Constitution give POTUS when it is proven the rest of the country as 'failed'?
You bike.
You being triggered is proof to Anons that YOU DON'T WANT POTUS GOING DOWN THIS PATH.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE SC FAILS A PREPLANNED 'STRESS TEST'?
WHAT AUTHORITY DOES THE CONSTITUTION GRANT POTUS?
WAAAAAAAAAAAAH IS WHAT YOU'RE DOING
What authority does the Constitution grant POTUS when the SC and all alphabet agencies are proven in the court of public opinion to have failed a preplanned stress test?
You being triggered today and angry today and not at all displaying a tone of victory today, red text 'anon', is proof THAT YOU HAVEN'T STOPPED BEING TERRIFIED AND ARE NOW TERRIFIED OF THE PATH POTUS JUST SIGNALLED HE IS GOING.
I don't think SCOTUS is 'comped', other than Roberts, I think they just lack the minimum courage and wisdom needed to save the country.
Fear and weakness I do not consider being 'comped', those are emotions that anyone can have, that good people can have.
What if the majority of SCOTUS, other than the two who indicated they did have the courage and wisdom, is just too afraid to be the branch of the government held as 'responsible' for why the deep state death cult of psychopathic killers didn't get their puppet into the WH?
Remember the threats against the CHILDREN of the certifiars?
These people will stop at nothing except their own deaths.
Anon Theory, baker, I humbly ask this be considered:
What if the three Trump nominees intentionally denied Texas as having a 'standing', because they're signaling the only plaintiff they'll accept as having standing…IS POTUS?
You can wake the world up by showing that almost the entire 'system' had broken down.
POTUS' tweet today, I look at the wording very closely.
"The Supreme Court had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America. All they were interested in is “standing”, which makes it very difficult for the President to present a case on the merits. 75,000,000 votes!" - POTUS
I think Q just successfully got the world, INCLUDING THOSE WHO HAVE TDS AND BELIEVE THIS IS 'THEIR' VICTORY, to accept the NARRATIVE that the only way the MERITS can…BREAK TROUGH….the clearly almost insurmountable barrier that is called 'standing'….THE WORLD HAS JUST ACCEPTED THE NARRATIVE THAT THE ROLE OF POTUS IS THE KEYSTONE FOR WORLDWIDE DOMINO COLLAPSE OF NWO…that unlocks the connection between declas INFORMATION and the world as having 'created', a narrative that accepts the fact that the TRUTH of what is REALLY happening can take the form of INFORMATION and the floodgates of declas can occur without being suppressed by the 'media' structure of how they 'enforce' STANDING.
Is the media even listening to anyone AND GRANT 'STANDING' IN THEY TREAT THE PEOPLE?
CAN'T EVEN GET FOOT IN THE DOOR?
"You don't even have 'standing' with us such that we'll hear your case and do real reporting on the happenings in the minds and bodies of what we call you 'sheep'"
THE SAME THING HAPPENING WITH THE ROLE OF POTUS IS HAPPENING TO EVERYONE WORLDWIDE WHO IS TOLD THEIR PROBLEMS DO NOT EVEN HAVE 'STANDING'?
BY ASSOCIATING THE PREPLANNED 'STAGE SET' DECLAS FOCUSED AND DIRECTED EXCLUSIVELY TO THE ROLE OF POTUS…AS PER THE CONSTITUTION.
The world's attention was needed to ensure a strong information 'communication' (how to get information copied exactly from one location (I.e. 'source') to another location (I.e.'duplication') at another.
Corrupted ("noise") interfere with information at such a say that it is very very very easy to be accompanied by the thought that the information at source does not exist but what does exist is the 'noise' channel?
http://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf
POTUS said it to everyone too. HE AGREES WITH WHAT IS A 'SOURCE' OUTSIDE HIS MIND.
Duplication of information from source to another location (ROLE OF POTUS), now the information will 'look like', AND CAN LOOK LIKE, why the founders needed a 'backhannel ROLE' that is the ONLY ROLE IN GOVERNMENT that is voted in by the ENTIRE NATION OF PEOPLE.
Now is the time for everyone to 'signal' they want to know the truth by declas that was planned eventually be associated to the role of POTUS?
This is why the media is SURROUNDING POTUS sourced information and introducing a lot of 'noise' to prevent accurate duplication in other locations, namely, the people's own minds and perceptions of reality.
I am imagining myself as a SCOTUS judge and if it were me IT WOULD NOT BE EASY to decide EVEN IF I KNEW THE TRUTH.
For I would have not only the risks of attack, which I view secondary, to the risk of my actions being so focused on me as capable of 'creating' a connection of THE TRUE INFORMATION ABOUT ELECTION FRAUD, that will almost certainly result in some people 'not being able to walk down the streets…as impacting that level of 'determining' the future of humanity.
Only if I felt there was some promise of safety, I will be honest. If I believed there is something out there inherently protective that is itself intelligent and originating 'source' information, I'd maybe not need the promise of any person's physical protection…but I may be offered it if what I knew needed defending against attacks for speaking it or writing it or believing it…
I think this is why the control of information is vital.
They need to prepare the role of POTUS to be such that the world would grasp the significance of 'them' losing the role of POTUS with the election of an outsider.
Declas directly by the most wronged person who was victimized by the loudest false accusers?
Imagine you being President.
Imagine you see your opposing candidate cheated.
Could your ability to persuade by better than any others?
Nobody is above another when it comes to being a fully capable individual 'Source' of information that is true?