https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/watch-live-wisconsin-supreme-court-holds-oral-arguments-in-trump-suit/
wisconsin live hearing
now, trump is not only a King, he is raysciss king…per the trannie judge
oh man,
trump attorney just smacked down another judge.
"Please Have Keys Made": Joe Biden Was Chinese Financier's "Office Mate" According To Hunter Biden Email
https://populist.press/joe-biden-was-chinese-financiers-office-mate-according-to-hunter-biden-email/
https://cms.zerohedge.com/political/please-have-keys-made-joe-biden-was-chinese-financiers-office-mate-according-hunter-biden
those women trannie judges are so worried that they will get outed as cheaters who won their elections in a rigged vote, too.
Wisconsin activist judge Jill Karofsky THINKS Trump is a RAYCISS KING…
https://twitter.com/skylark_design/status/1337883149787942913
SkyLark Web Design
@skylark_design
Replying to
@realDonaldTrump
and
@BrianKempGA
Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Jill Karofsky told Trump attorney that the lawsuit “smacks of racism.”
“I do not know how you can come before this court and possibly ask for a remedy that is unheard of in U.S. history,” she said. “It is not normal.”
Trump legal team loses federal case in Wisconsin, argues another in state's Supreme Court
With the Trump legal team arguing a case before the Wisconsin Supreme Court Saturday seeking to have hundreds of thousands of ballots in two blue counties tossed, the president’s reelection effort…
foxnews.com
4:12 PM · Dec 12, 2020·
https://electionwiz.com/2020/12/12/law-professor-trump-case-not-dead/
Law professor: Texas Election Case Not Dead
BY THE WIZ ON DECEMBER 12, 2020 • ( LEAVE A COMMENT )
December 12, 2020 | 4:45 PM
WASHINGTON — George Washington University Law professor John Banzhaf said the Texas election case is not dead.
Banzhaf said lawyers for President Trump could copy the entire Texas election case, including the novel theories and claims it contained, and file it in Trump’s own name. Banzhaf said doing so would strengthen legal standing of the case.
Because Trump is an individual and not a state, he would have to file the case in a lower court, not the Supreme Court.
Professor Banzhaf, who has won several cases virtually all experts considered impossible, said that even if President Trump cures the standing issues, he’s doubtful the President can ultimately win.
https://www.prlog.org/12850360-texas-election-case-not-completely-dead.html
Texas Election Case Not Completely Dead
Standing Problem Might Be Cured, But Many Other Problems Remain
By: Public Interest Law Professor John Banzhaf
WASHINGTON - Dec. 11, 2020 - PRLog – Although many are relieved if not overjoyed that the U.S. Supreme Court has overwhelmingly rejected the case brought by Texas to challenge the presidential election results in four other states, that doesn't necessarily mean that this very strange case is absolutely and completely dead, says public interest law professor John Banzhaf, who has won several cases virtually all experts considered impossible, and helped establish a novel precedent regarding legal standing..
The Supreme Court rejected the case because, it said, Texas lacked legal standing, since it could not show that its own interest as a state had been injured; in other words, Texas could not show that it could even possibly suffer an injury.
But President Trump can make that very claim, arguing that if the various theories argued in the Texas case were correct, he would have won the Electoral College.
In other words, Trump, unlike Texas, can claim what the law calls an "injury in fact," the major criteria necessary to claim standing.
So, at least theoretically, lawyers for Trump could copy virtually the entire case, including the novel theories and claims it contained, and file it in his own name because he would be in a much stronger position to claim legal standing.
Since Trump is an individual and not a state, he would have to file his case in a lower court, not the Supreme Court, but theoretically he could do it.
Even if Trump has legal standing, says Banzhaf, who managed to get standing for his law students to challenge environmental harm to the entire country just after the Sierra Club's environmental law suit was rejected by the Supreme Court for lack of standing, it would still have all of the weaknesses if not weirdnesses of Texas' Supreme Court law suit, and is probably no more likely to be heard, much less won.
But Trump filing a law suit based on Texas's legal theories is no more bizarre and farfetched than the original Texas suit itself, argues Banzhaf, who doubts that even Trump would try a second Hail Mary.
http://banzhaf.net/ jbanzhaf3ATgmail.com @profbanzhaf
Contact
GW LAW
***@gmail.com
End