Anonymous ID: 5938d9 Dec. 12, 2020, 7:52 p.m. No.12004063   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4129

Just had a curious thought anons, comment if you think it's crazy.

 

The DOJ amendment to the execution rules takes effect on Christmas Eve. Could that be a reason why charges have been held off? Would they (Patriots) hold off on charging until the rule change?

 

Would it make a difference?

 

Not sure, but I do want to wish a Merry GITMAS or DOORKNOB to the DS - which ever is your preferred method.

Anonymous ID: 5938d9 Dec. 12, 2020, 7:58 p.m. No.12004127   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4137 >>4256

>>12004103

Dirt from way back.

 

A federal criminal investigation into Torricelli was dropped in early 2002.[16][17] In the summer of 2002, however, Torricelli received a formal letter of admonishment from the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics following an investigation into his alleged receipt of improper gifts from campaign donor David Chang. Chang had pleaded guilty to violating federal election laws.[18][19][20] Torricelli apologized to voters for his behavior and delivered a speech in which he promised to take "'full personal responsibility'" for his actions. On September 30, 2002, Torricelli ended his 2002 re-election campaign after Republicans "successfully made the incumbent's ethics troubles stemming from illegal 1996 campaign donations and questionable gifts a campaign issueโ€ฆ"[18] Shortly thereafter, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Democratic Party could legally replace Torricelli's name on the ballot with that of former U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg.[21][22]

 

In 2007, Torricelli drew public criticism despite federal rules allowing retired officials to give leftover campaign funds to political parties, candidates and charities when his leftover campaign funds, given to the Rosemont Foundation, were not funneled back to his political party.[23][24]