>>12005679

You're not wrong. still alot of markers to go though but seems like the time is neigh .

I can see a concernfag wave come when\if Biden gets announced. on the 15th. hopefully the legislatures vote trump for enough electorates and we don't need that followed by trust the plan. This anon is not sick of winning. Win moar plz.

>>12005717

You could be right I thought they can confirm 15th.

Maybe I was thinking of this

>>12005717

https://www.nytimes.com/article/us-election-results-trump-biden.html

>>12005764

senate confirms Jan 6th and if there is still dispute the govenor can select the legislators against the certified vote total and the law will side with a govenor and 3 of the 4 contested states are republican govs.

>>12005786

regardless tomorrow they will choose the electorates. and on the 6th if it's still disputed the govonor can assign the electorates. anything else is date fagging and we're usually wrong when it comes to date fagging I agree I should of stuck with my gut and not linked some article I was off on doubting myself haha

>>12005810

exactly plus if all else fails it goes to congress, still many paths.

>>12005831

he could in a contested state. and then congress would ratify. but they usually side with the govonors choice of electorate. it's alot of murk

>>12005859

>>12005873

I never disputed that as the end game is that

and I even stated the same. without screaming read the ammendment. But what I said is not wrong it just a step along the way.

https://www.nytimes.com/article/us-election-results-trump-biden.html

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1338043104952082433