SCOTUS' Texas ruling means that states have no standing to challenge other states' mismanagement, unconsitutionality, or fraudulence of elections. The implication is that states' sovereignty is so strong that should elections within a state become so corrupt as to even become a laughingstock, there is nothing to be done to correct it. For any other kind of fraud, you could say, let the people of the state resolve it by electing better leaders. But if the fraud is election fraud, then there is no way for the state to heal itself. The state's immune system elections is compromised. Such states have become a cancer to the Union and the only thing left to do is cut these states off from the Union. This is the only logical conclusion to draw from SCOTUS' ruling. Unless of course the President has some other tool to clean these states up. I wonder if he does.