Anonymous ID: 11a4b3 Dec. 13, 2020, 8:20 a.m. No.12008630   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8637 >>8640 >>8643 >>8651 >>8653 >>8661 >>8697 >>9095 >>9212

Where's Hillary? 2016 election loser so far finds no role on Team Biden

 

it's been more than a month since Election Day 2020, and Americans haven hardly heard a peep out of her. What's more, the former secretary of state for President Barack Obama has been given no role in a prospective Biden administration, even though at 72 she's younger the 78-year-old Biden.

 

It's not like Biden hasn't made room for others from former administrations. After all, he found room as climate czar for John Kerry, who served as secretary of state from 2013 to 2017 under Obama. But so far, nothing for Clinton.

 

https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/ready-wheres-hillary-2016-loser-finds-no-role-biden-administration

Anonymous ID: 11a4b3 Dec. 13, 2020, 8:41 a.m. No.12008818   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8936

POTUS's tweet today regarding the outrageous defense bill which passed the Senate "The final vote on the bill was 84-13, similar to the support the measure received in the House." Who actually decided the votes were "veto-proof"?

Is there an actual legislation on that, or is it just CNN making up the rules as they go thing again?

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/11/politics/senate-defense-bill-trump-veto-proof-majority/index.html

CNN claims in it's headline that the bill was passed with a "veto-proof" majority, yet they offer zero source (s) to support that claim, no surprise there. Then, they end the article stating: "If Trump successfully vetoes the NDAA it would impact "special pay" for thousands of US service members across the military branches. Special pay includes raises for service members in highly-skilled positions where there is a lot of competition with the private sector for personnel."

Obviously they count on their sheep followers to not read past the headline; they need to be called out on this and every hypocrisy they choose to publish.

Anonymous ID: 11a4b3 Dec. 13, 2020, 8:53 a.m. No.12008936   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9095 >>9212

>>12008818

HA answered my own question; if anyone is interested this is article gives a succinct and easily understandable explanation.

 

"The veto occurs when a President objects to a bill or resolution. The President usually sends the bill back to Congress with a message explaining his objections; this is known as a direct veto. If the President withholds his signature during the 10-day review period allowed by the Constitution and Congress adjourns during that period, it is considered a “pocket veto” and the bill doesn’t become a law. The last pocket veto used by President Bill Clinton in December 2000."

 

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-presidential-veto-power-explained

 

Also:

 

"Once a bill has been passed by both Houses, it is sent to the President. The President then has ten days to consider the bill. If he doesn’t do anything, it automatically becomes a law. If he approves of the bill, he may sign it, and it becomes a law. If he disapproves of the law, he can send it back to Congress with his objections. This is known as a veto. The bill then can only become law if both Houses of Congress override the veto.This can only be accomplished by a 2/3 majority vote in both Houses. Obviously this is not an easy task – of the thousands of vetoes issued by presidents, only a small percentage has been overridden"

 

https://constitutionallawreporter.com/article-01-section-07/

 

Overriding a presidential veto requires a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate, as specified in Article 1, Section 7. Given the expected vote margin in the Senate, it is unlikely Congress will override the expected President Trump veto, so the veto will be sustained.

Anonymous ID: 11a4b3 Dec. 13, 2020, 9:08 a.m. No.12009142   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9268

Rex Bear inter views Penelope Jean Hayes and Carole Serene, authors of Do Unto Earth, It's Not Too Late.

 

Penelope describes her journey from deep, almost suicidal depression to tapping into Earth's spirit, along with having conversations with God.

 

The video is well worth the 58 minutes: https://youtu.be/SJzsy374Ggo

 

Holy shit, I just noticed what youtube added to it's share link, pic related the Chinese twitter?

Anonymous ID: 11a4b3 Dec. 13, 2020, 9:18 a.m. No.12009268   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12009142

Just noticed the publisher of Do Unto Earth is Waterside Productions, see pic for logo. Is it even possible to consider this publishing house has anything to do with "Watch the Water"? and could Penelope be an undiscovered Star?

Crazy Sunday meanderings, anons…