lawfag here
dont even need to read the 1925 act to know its faggot and fuckery as always
the constitution clearly REQUIRES Scotus to accept and hear cases between states
that is their ORIGINAL jurisdiction
they can decide any way they want EXCEPT dismissal for lack of jurisdiction which is essentially what lack of standing is in this context
thomas is 100% correct
btw the court did not bother to even cite that law in their decision
its like the logan act
on the books and meaningless (or worse) like SO many federal laws
the whole system is trash
utter and complete trash
at this point i dont care what they do
i prefer the bombs and reconstruction that we all hope is still coming