>>12018546 (lb)
>innocent anons might be injured.
true enough.
I'm actually very knowledgeable about fusion and have even invested in a certain fusion company before I figured out (I think) that they're just another scam front company (likely clowns.) (Beware…I think they're all fronts/honeypots now.)
Silver lining: I think it is possible to do fusion relatively easily now since I've figured out more about how the universe actually works. WAY off topic for this board, though. Since you're interested, I'll say this: Don't focus on containment; instead, focus on how to avoid losing the energy involved in creating and containing the fusion in the first place. That's where the solution is. Solutions are often somewhere other than where everyone is focused. I've socked the solution away and maybe someday I'll get to it.
Another gem: I think Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower was actually a focused field fusion reactor. Drop a droplet of pB11 from the top and blast an EM pulse from the ball on top so it focuses on the drop at just the right time and you'll get an enormous burst of fusion that could be aimed at a coil underneath. Tesla's original patent drawings show a huge coil beneath the toward that is often omitted from diagrams. I think all of the energy transmission bullshit spread about this tower is a wild goose chase.
cheers.