>>12029236 (PB)

>>12029187 (You)

>I apologize for what anons have to endure with these fakes. I will say if more anons would bake there wouldn't be ANY opportunity for Gerbil to pull that kind of shit (or comms for that matter).

>Something to think about. - Bakers are anons and anons are bakers - Gerbil took advantage of anons not baking and will do so again if anons don't start baking.

Appreciate what you are trying to say here, but again I disagree. It would appear that roles were defined long ago by Q in these drops:

#1296

#1297

#2857

#3056

>>12029726

Go back to your hole AJ.

Barr stated 07/28/20 :

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) asked the attorney general: "Mr. Barr … what will you do if Donald Trump loses the election on November 3rd but refuses to leave office on January 20th?”

Barr answered: "Well, if the results are clear, I would leave office.”

“Do you believe that there is any basis or legitimacy to Donald Trump’s recent claim that he can’t provide an answer as to whether he would leave office?" Jeffries followed up.

“I really am not familiar with these comments or the context in which they occurred, so I’m not going to give commentary on them," Barr replied

Barr on the election: 'If the results are clear, I would leave office'

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/509458-barr-if-the-results-are-clear-i-would-leave-office