I had the exact same criticism, Q seems to address this here:
My guess is something about this email was true when it originally was leaked, possibly by a Patriot at no such agency, but it was done in a way that it remained anonymous and couldn't be proven in any way, so it fizzled as a fake.
Q is refreshing the earlier "leak" to indicate something is coming related to election fraud.
Most of your summaries seem correct, but I don't buy the "defendants" explanation for the CLAS numbers at all.
If you actually apply it, it doesn't really make sense.
The largest amount of defendants for the list of crimes that HRC WOULD have committed IF she were elected for 8 years?
These people aren't all "pure EVIL" though, only 1-59?
18 defendants are all involved with Scalia, U1, and killing NASA? A bit of a random list don't you think?
I think it's clear they stand for people or organizations, but I don't think they stand for a straight list of 99 people, with their crimes laid out. There's more to it than that.