Integrate the hashtag
"#BlueWave2018"
if you want to target the Democrat movement.
That is a great blue wave sarcasm.
Was 2016 BEFORE the date of the alleged criminal activity?
IF so, then that sort of explains it.
Crime comes after email.
Years later perhaps, these things have to be planned and covered up.
This was for the Alabama special election…
Does anyone assume Soros (or anyone else) could rig an election in a few days without a few years preparation?
That's my take.
Instead of proving the email VALID
(Q did not say either way.)
I respectfully suggest that you/we prove it fake.
(if your goal is to do so)
The date can be explained because it was before the crime, etc. etc.
Yet if it is fake, it is a publicly circulated (twittered) source of a story that is "close enough to truth" to get the message across without leaking agency sensitive data.
The sauce does not have to be true to point to Soros owning the election. We already knew that, and that nearly all elections were rigged.
So it's authenticity is mildly irrelevant, but most anons will want to know. And I too would not mind knowing the facts. But I think there is a bigger message to be received…
Yes… you said it better…
Truth in content or date is irrelevant.
It was a crumb. Not a fact.
Also, the town and programmer do not exist.
It is a crumb.
Not FACT.
But I get it and why Q posted (and then deleted) it.
Trying to explain it is hard actually.
What does "DOGS" mean?!?!