yeah, after reading they were yelling at each other whether they would hear the Texas filing, wouldn't be surprised the way all this massive fuckery is bubbling up.
the swamp is moar like the La Brea Tar Pits, thick with some nasty shit.
The US Supreme Court has been compromised for many decades, since 1925.
Re:
The Supreme Court’s Claim of Discretion is Unconstitutional
The Supreme Court made it abundantly clear that “The Supreme Court alone possesses jurisdiction derived immediately from the Constitution, and of which the legislative power cannot deprive it.” Stevenson v Fain, 195 US 165, 167 (1904). In Reid v Covert, 384 US 1, 41 (1987) this Court quoted Lord Coke: “God send me never to live under the law of conveniency or discretion.” The jurisdiction of this Court was created by the Constitution. It requires an amendment to the constitution to alter that jurisdiction, not a statute passed by Congress. Therefore, the Judiciary Act of 1925 is unconstitutional.
The only court required by the Constitution is the Supreme Court and every Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States are required to take two oaths before they may execute the duties of their appointed office – (1) the Constitutional Oath to defend it and (2) the Judicial Oath.
Therefore, anyone can see on its face that the Judiciary Act of 1925 is unconstitutional for it violates their oath to defend the constitution when they have the discretion to not hear cases. Previously, the Supreme Court ruled and ignored this time when it defined “discretion” by saying “the term ‘discretion’ denotes the absence of a hard and fast rule.” Langnes v Green, 282 US 531, 541 (1931). This means that those in power do not have to obey any law, even the Constitution. The Supreme Court also said, “it is obvious that discretion does not exist where there is no power to act except in one way.” Jones v SEC, 298 US 1, 18 (1936). When judges and politicians claim discretion, they claim to be ABOVE the law of men.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/the-supreme-courts-claim-of-discretion-is-unconstitutional/
think about the many brain dead decisions that have been made by the Supreme Court, decisions normal reasonable minds can't wrap around and there you have the upside down activist infiltration doing the DS bidding. Not to say, they're haven't been good justices.
the State of court now is ridiculous, actually insane, like Congress and institutional bureaucracies.
sauce and date stamp ornot notable
don't be foolish is the etiquette