>>12033228 (pb)

At least if they are saying this publicly their is hope of rebutting it. Someone showed me a video of someone testing various masks including N95-type (it wasn't actual N95 but similar) while vaping. Instantly put the lie to stopping aerosols with a mask. As for something like an N95– that one will protect the WEARER but with the vent -all the aerosols go directly OUT. Meaning the mask only has benefits for wearer, if any at all.

I learned from the "anti-vax" movement (medical freedom movement in reality) that one of the biggest canards out there is the "you must protect ME" lie. This can be challenged on so many levels, but basically it boils down to this. I accept or reject the risks and benefits of a medical procedure (including masking outside of surgical/medical situation) based on their risks and benefits for me. It is unknowable if me wearing a mask does ANYTHING for anyone else. However, we can be certain that taking a vaccine or masking for hours in a public setting will have risks for those that choose those options. Where there is risk there must be informed consent and freedom of choice/conscience. Basic Nuremburg code type stuff here.

These lies should be turned around and show to be what they are: lies. Some anti-vaxxers have taken to pointing out the obvious by using a birth control example. Asking someone to take a vaccine to "protect others"( or in this case to mask themselves in public) is like a woman asking her friend to take "the pill" so she has a lower pregnancy risk!

>>12034118

This is really, really important. Election fraud was ALLOWED to proceed so that it could be captured in real time and so the brutal truth would become obvious to patriots (our elections are hopelessly comped without major corrective action). What if medical/scientific fraud was similarly ALLOWED to proceed for the same reasons? "THEY" get to develop their bioweapon (the vaccine, stupid, not the "head cold" virus) AND get it to the point of distribution, all in order to show the American people and the world that we have been lied to for years. That our CDC is hopelessly comped, traitorous and in bed with foreign malign interests hell bent on destroying us via a vaccine bioweapons program. That ALL data out of the CDC is provided for one reason: To get us to fear the wrong things in order to drive us toward what we should truly be horrified by.

>>12034267

Not allowing "China virus" necessarily. What I meant is allowing the vaccine production to continue.

Many of us (anti-vaxxers) hoped early in the Trump presidency that he would work with RFK, Jr. to have a vaccine safety commission. However, in retrospect, asking for help on vaccine safety from the likes of Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, etc.. would have been much, much worse than letting the fox guard the hen house. It would have been asking the perps to investigate themselves.

This has meant the destruction via vaccine has continued apace during Trump's first term. When the truth is revealed I think many "medical professionals" will face death. Many by their own hands and many more because they can't walk the streets anymore.

SIDS is an acronym for what is usually a "vaccine preventable" situation. Meaning that the baby would not be dead if he or she had not been vaccinated. This happened to the friend of an acquaintance just this year. Baby died after their vaccines. Imagine millions upon millions of us waking up to this reality. Plus many, many severely disabled children are that way due to the vaccines. And Hillary wanted to import "made in China" vaccines WITHOUT US safety testing at all.

Thanks for that screen cap, that I just 'borrowed'. My thinking on this subject is very, very similar. In a war situation, the first group of "enemy combatants" I would address is the US CDC.

I like the idea of blowing the damn Dam, but still wonder about millions (including many innocents, I'm sure) downstream. Would certainly address massive amounts of pharma production and get Chinese communists off our back for a minute. Glad I am not the one or ones calling those "shots". Prayer helps me a lot when I feel just livid over the covert culling and disabling of America (especially the babies) via the vaccines. Using "public health" to destroy us and lying to parents about vaccines being "safe and effective" is probably the most diabolical thing I am aware of.

>>12034697 (pb)

Maybe you aren't a shill so I will try to respond to this.

I disagree with your conclusion. Of course I'd hope Q team is trying to prevent massive violence on the streets…which would open us to further potential for foreign interference or even invasion. However, I believe the end goal is really to return power to the people so that we decide what happens next. Why did Q reference the Declaration of Independence so many times, but not quote the Constitution.

I am glad Q team and the President seem to be operating within the bounds of existing laws/structure. When that gets departed from it will still be "legal" in that it will be as it should be, by the "will of the people".