>>1203764

trust is truly a situation/scenario/opportunity based event assessment.

even a person posing a question regarding questions of trust will never have the exact same interpetation of meaning as the target of the question.

since trust is so important and fundamental to human relations and self identity/perception imho it always should have clarifiers.

as example most if not all people can be put in a position whereby a high level of trust can be expected, and also in situations where they receive a low level of trust.

often people cite can you trust a person to do the right thing?

without explaining that the right thing may have variables from one person to the next. trust cannot and should not really be generalized, but should be made as specific as possible given varying situations.

like 99% of people trust them both to do whats best for them.

trust bannon moar to do things for others from a ideological position.

me thinks bannon understands the threats we are faced with, and does his part to help.

me thinks stone does not care to get into fights that are bigger than himself.