>>12040329 (/lb)

Look Debbie Downer, what you arrogantly perceive yourself as 'looking deeply' into, is in reality just your own narcissistic 'image' projected outward as what 'real' humanity is.

I am nothing like your Debbie Downer brooding hokey 'everyone is deep down what I say they are' projection, yet I am human.

Are you so misguided as believe that when considering a complex being with the capacity to be happy and sad, that it is somehow 'dishonest' or 'incomplete' to strive after happiness, but 'honest' and 'complete' to strive after sanctioning your own misery?

Why is one 'artificial' but the other 'real', when by your own logic you can't even make sense of what 'deep humanity' is without including the extrema and range of all humane emotion?

If the capacity to do evil justifies living evil, then why wouldn't the capacity to live good justify living good?

I'm not 'shallow' for knowing my full nature is expressed through HUMILITY combined with the courage to know that happiness can be had with full truth and transparency of self and loved ones.

I am not 'missing the full picture' by refusing to erase the good I have the capacity to feel and do, simply because of a logical acceptance that I could do evil. I would be missing out if I were to become a Debbie Downer. I'd be splitting myself into two.

I am a finite, mortal, corporeal, temporal being of flesh and blood and spirit.

Nobody is above another.

Your insulting and pompous need to divide people by age, as if old people are necessarily better informed than young people (anyone who has worked at a large firm, or live in a family household, knows that advanced age does not equate to advanced 'wisdom'), I only reply to ideas, not subjective demands for 'recognition' simply because you shit and piss and eat like I do.

>>12040378

>>12040433

Yes, I was triggered.

Now what?

Is that supposed to be the end of it?

Nothing can ever be said that true if it was psychologically motivated by being 'triggered'?

If I were to become 'triggered' at seeing 2+2=5, would I be wrong to reply with 2+2=4?

Come on, teach me wise Anon on what the actual TRUTH VALUE of what is written down by a source that is 'triggered', because clearly I don't know what you know about it.

>>12040479

>>12040487

Lo

>>12040493

>https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1338934705543065601?s=20

POTUS will be well insulated onboard AF1 when shit goes down?

>>12040509

When did you say you said I was angry? This is the first time I've seen you say that.

But this is not about me, this is about you Debbie Downer.

You gave an 'option' presented as fact where everyone who reads it is either wrong for rejecting it or right for accepting it.

You never said "I believe that…", you just flat out said "Humanity is".

Do you not know the difference between making an objective statement about about a concept that includes ME, and OTHERS, besides you, and a subjective statement where oh golly shucks you're just giving your opinion?

You say now you give an opinion.

Since you were claiming to SPEAK ON BEHALF OF ME AND OTHERS AND 7.5 BILLION others, and oh yes you did claim to do so every time you say "Humanity is…", all I did was put your galactic sized ego back where it belongs, to speak for your damn self and stop trying to tell other people who they 'really are'.

Why am I triggered?

Because I am reading statements I know I didn't write, purporting to describe my true inner self and there wasn't even a damn courtesy to ASK before you just blanket condemned me and everyone else for failing to 'look deeply' into ourselves.

Fuck dude, are you like one of those people at parties who starts proselytizing about what everyone else is about, and others are too embarrassed to mention you're making them feel uncomfortable for having to tell you to either stfu or just speak for yourself for once?

>>12040594

I just clicked the video, and right away I hears "How was the data transferred?"

"I don't have an answer for that".

>>12040594

It's amazing these questions are happening only now, AFTER THEY WERE USED FOR A NATIONAL ELECTION.

>>12040654

In effect Biden's team is just saying don't show up for Trump's inauguration.

>>12040694

GLOBALIST PROPAGANDA

IFI were a fake news presstitute, I would have taken the FACT that in PA, GA, MI, WI, AZ, NV, and NM all had GOP electors cast votes for Trump, but I would have SUPPRESSED the fact that the Democrat electors in those states did the same and voted Biden, and I would have blasted from the rooftops that

"It's official, electoral colleges for all 50 states have all wrapped up and the result is that the majority of electoral college votes have gone to Donald Trump".

But I won't do that because I'm not a fake news presstitute.

I would describe and explain the Constitutional process on what happens when there is a dispute from the electors, what the 12th amendment lays out, what roles people will play by law, and also I would not suppress the truth of massive election fraud perpetrated by the Democrat Party.

>>12040844

I've decoded this stringer!

It says Anon is a larp.

>>12040539

You're falsely presuming a power the deep state does not have, and you're falsely presuming the military doesn't have what it does have.