Anonymous ID: 9b2bd2 April 26, 2018, 8:11 p.m. No.1204583   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4589 >>4602

Don't think I've seen this asked yet.

 

>Q [auth478-24zgP]

 

Is it relevant that the [auth] code is after Q's signature, not before it?

I can't recall ever having seen a "postscript" after the signature like that (other than Q+).

Anonymous ID: 9b2bd2 April 26, 2018, 8:29 p.m. No.1204843   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5185

>>1204774

If [nothing is ever deleted], I would almost think this would be the last thing you would want to use.

That would be the first place people would look for things that people want to hide.

Anonymous ID: 9b2bd2 April 26, 2018, 8:41 p.m. No.1204987   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1204929

Sounds good to me.

One other benefit is that the longer it takes, the more people start clamoring for the texts to be released, and the more attention when they are released.

Anonymous ID: 9b2bd2 April 26, 2018, 8:43 p.m. No.1205015   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5046

>>1204936

Presumably the comms part would bring up a text box of some sort, though?

This image just makes it look like he would rather be elsewhere.

Like the CBCers that were caught playing Candy Crush.

Looks disrespectful or disdainful but not nefarious.