I'm also not a shill.
Labeling anyone who presents logical arguments, based on facts, reason, and evidence, that suggest the plan has failed a shill is cognitive dissonance.
How about rather than just dismissing me as a shill you refute what I said? o that's right you can't, but accepting that I'm right would be a huge shock to your psyche so you must dismiss me to protect your fragile mind. text book cognitive dissonance. Cult like behavior
Hey new lurkers.
What would you call a group of individuals who all share the same rigid belief systems and worldview and dismiss anyone who presents evidence to contrary as a troll/shill/crazy/clown/etc…
Sounds kinds like a cult right?
Why is it that anons claim to be all about debating ideas and free thought yet they immediately dismiss anything that contradicts thier beliefs?
Q is legit. POTUS has been fighting for us. But if you objectively look at the evidence they have lost that fight. Recognizing this does not make one a shill/troll, it makes you an objective free thinker.
here's my evidence.
3 years of the Q operation:
no indectments
no arrests
-Trust Sessions
-Trust Wray
-Trust Barr
-Trust Durham
Bioweapon attack on the country
Lockdowns
Economic destruction
media still lying
big tech still censoring
election rigged
electoral college vote confirmed
3 cowardly SCOTUS appointments won;t hear cases
Those are all facts, and they are all evidence that The plan either never existed or failed.
No. think for yourself.
Thats the problem with most of the anons. They claim they don't tell you want to think. yet they mandate everyone must blindly "Trust the plan". Anyone who doesn't is a shill/troll.
Its the Cult-like anons that tell people what to think. I'm one of the few on this board who wants open debate
This is not an argument. calling me a commie lover does not refute the fact that everything i just presented is evidence that the plan doesn't exist or failed.
So you claim I'm a shill and that shills never provide evidence. I then turn around and provide tons of evidence and your response is attack me personally. Which one of us is the conman and which one is trying to engage in rational debate?
comparing me to a monkey does not refute all the evidence i just put forth that the plan either failed or doesn't exist.
If i am really such a shill it should be easy to prove how I am wrong in coming to the conclusion that all those facts I listed are evidence of Q teams failure. Either refute my argument or you have to accept it as truth
The burden is on you to PROVE that I have missed something. PROVE that all those facts i just listed aren't evidence of Q teams failures. Just claiming those facts are irrelevant and things are happening is not a refutation. Its telling people what to think rather than convincing them I am wrong/you are correct.
If disinformation is necessary, and its impossible to tell what is or isn't disinformation. then how can you be certain the claim that there is a plan and patriots are in control isn't also disinformation?
using the excuse that disinformation is necessary only to dismiss the facts contrary to your rigged worldview is cognitive dissonance.
Attacking me personally does not disprove the argument i put forth. however dumb I may or may not be does not change the fact that all those things are overwhelming proof that the plan either never existed or has failed.
Jesus christ you all do the same fucking thing. Not one of you anons has even tried to refute the evidence and conclusion I put forth all you do is attack me personally.
ATTACKING ME PERSONALLY DOES NOT MAKE MY ARGUMENT UNTRUE YOU STUPID FUCKS!
I've been doing that for too long. The movement is only as strong as our weakest soldiers and their are a lot of dumb ass motherfucking anons on here incapable of forming coherent argument and holding rational debate. Its about time they get exposed and cult-anons get purged.
So COVID-19 didn't happen?
COVID-19 didn't originate in the wuhan bio lab?
COVID-19 didn't spread across the globe due to Chinese suppression of the facts early in the outbreak?
what would you call the intentional release of a bioengineered virus to crush Trump's economy and provide cover for the mail-in voting scam? a fucking hug?
The big deal is the anons that do see a plan in place demand everyone else must also. anyone like me who disagrees with their viewpoint is labeled a shill/troll/clown. THATS THE FUCKING PROBLEM!
this board use to be all about debate, it has devolved into a cult mind where diverging opinion is exiled.
Look another personal attack and label to dismiss the person with a differing viewpoint. people like you anon are the fucking problem.
If I'm wrong, you should be able to refute the argument i put forth. resorting to attacking me personally is a pathetic attempt to ignore facts reason and evidence you don't want to accept.
Weather or not I've read all the material is irrelevant. An argument stands on its own.
I put forth a list of evidence that proves there either is no plan or the plan failed. If I am wrong because i haven't read enough then you should easily be able to prove how I am wrong. Just claiming i haven't read enough is an attempt to dismiss my argument without actually having to prove me wrong.
All of these fucktarded anons that aren't capable on engaging in rational debate are the ones out there making the entire digitalsoldier army look bat shit crazy to the normies. we need to stop letting these low intelligence people dictate the acceptable boundaries of discourse in the pursuit of truth.
Ahh yes, the filter button. The last line of defense for the low intelligence cult- anon.
When you can't logically refute an argument and anon won't back down from your ad-hominem attacks there's always the last resort of ignoring them completely. That way you never have to accept the fact that you can't disprove their incontinent truth.
Anons like this are not free thinkers, they don't want debate, they want to tell you what to think, and you aren't allowed to disagree with them.
Calling me low IQ does not refute the argument I put forth. If i am really wrong in my conclusion that all those facts are evidence of there either being no plan or the plan failed you should be able to show how i am wrong. simply attacking me personally is the actual low-iq move
lets say thats true. there have been arrests. ok, that address ONE item from the list of evidence.
Now explain how am I wrong about all the others, if you can;t the logical conclusion is that I am correct there either is no plan or the plan failed.
Hey, I didn't start this. the Cult anons brought this on themselves when they labeled me a shill for having wrongthink.
This all ends the minute they concede I put forth a rational argument. They may not like the truth that argument exposes, but its still truth.
No my argument is the below list of facts are proof that either that was no plan or the plan failed:
3 years of the Q operation:
no indectments
no arrests
-Trust Sessions
-Trust Wray
-Trust Barr
-Trust Durham
Bioweapon attack on the country
Lockdowns
Economic destruction
media still lying
big tech still censoring
election rigged
electoral college vote confirmed
3 cowardly SCOTUS appointments won;t hear cases
here is my list of plan failures. put together your list of plan success and lets compare/contrast
3 years of the Q operation:
no indectments
no arrests
-Trust Sessions
-Trust Wray
-Trust Barr
-Trust Durham
Bioweapon attack on the country
Lockdowns
Economic destruction
media still lying
big tech still censoring
election rigged
electoral college vote confirmed
3 cowardly SCOTUS appointments won't hear cases
The fact that the plan failed does not mean i am happy that the plan failed. I am actually quite terrified. Civil war is the only option we have left. I believe its a war worth fighting.
I'm just trying to expose all these cult anons that immediately go to shill labeling in the face of any argument they find uncomfortable to accept. This board use to be some of the best intellectual debate on the internet. as the great awakening has grown the influx non-autist has brought with it a wave of dumb fucks who don't understand basic logical fallacies. its hurting the cause.
the facts behind "trust xyz" is that they all turned out to be deepstate traitors. Which is proof Qteam got duped because there was no fucking plan. the patriots have been winging it the whole time.
Ok, now I think we all can agree THIS is a shill.
this isn't rational fact based argument this is provocative bullshit. Fuck this guy along with all the cult anons that call me a shill for simply putting forth arguments you don't want to accept.
Faith is not an argument. by definition faith is ant-intellectual. If your only rebuttal to an argument is "but i have faith you're wrong" its a concession that you have no rational refutation
nobody wants too or nobody can?
all i takes is one anon to actually put forth a logical rebuttal to my claims and I go away. Yet not one anon can. Because my argument is TRUE and you can't refute truth.