Anons..

The problems with the breads on the Q research general thread is getting out of hand. Rogue bakers are being very disruptive. Maybe we figure out a way to still be anon and verify bakes via blockchain.

What I propose is to choose a cryptocurrency such as XLM which is abundant, low priced, and most importantly has a high speed transaction confirmation rate of a matter of seconds.

So this is how the bake confirmations could work:

For example, bakers would send .000001 XLM (which is worth a fraction of a cent) to a specific defined wallet address. I propose that the receiving wallet address of whatever crypto that is used be the donate address for said crypto creator organization, that way anon bakers know who the receiver is and there can be no troubles with that or legal issues (that way they couldn’t say bakers were sending these to bad people).

The baker would then post the blockchain explorer link in the bread along with the paste bin. The explorer link would show the bakers public wallet address and the public wallet address of the receiver (the creators orgs or foundation donate address). Because the baker’s public wallet address is on a whitelist of good bakers we would know the bake is legit by comparing on the transaction the sender wallet address with the whitelist. Since the transaction confirmations are high (only takes seconds) we could know quickly if the bread is good or not.

I know this sounds cumbersome but it is an effective way to weed out the bad apples, stay anonymous and carry on with Q research.

This thread is in kitchen meta if you want to respond here:

>>12053661 (Different Bread/Thread)