>>12067250 /pb notable:
Peter Nygard, Jeffrey Epstein, and the Fashion to Sexual Assault Pipeline
https://youtu.be/spw5nmUrpWA
PENTAGON BRIEFING ON REMOVING THE GOD GENE - "FUNVAX"
Thanks to Joey Lambardi, the Man responsible for leaking this video. He was set up on charges and imprisoned. Please research this topic. In Lombardi's own words…
"I was on this assignment that seemed really bizarre. It just didn't make any sense, you know? I was told that I was to document a war hero's return home from Iraq. That was it – simple right? But the normal chain of command was altered. In this case, the first time in six years, I was to report to a CIA named agent Fleming as well as Army Col. Harris who from what I gather was a big wig intel guy at the pentagon. So, that was weird, especially for such a boring sounding assignment. It got weirder when I was mailed a package that contained a DVD and a stack of documents. There were a lot of things blacked out, but it was all stuff related to FunVax. The package was address to me, it was sent to the house where I where I was, you know, videotaping, the family that I was documenting.
There were two videos actually. One looked like a homemade amateur video that was of a party in a common area, like a lunch room or something. There's a cake that says "FunVax is a Go" on it and there was a sign that said Congratulations FunVax. But that was all the funvax related information. It was just a normal party, the people were talking about normal things. The second video was a lot more informative. It was DoD footage from a lecture hall in the pentagon. The video was date stamped 4/13/05 so someone was holding onto this for awhile. I received it, the second week of February of this year. So, on it, it had one of the guys from the other video, the party video, giving a presentation. I just have an 8 minute clip from this presentation, but basically, this guy, he must be a scientist. This guy is giving a lecture about the brain and a gene called VMAT2 to a group of men in suits as well as various military uniforms. He talks about religion and was showing MRI brain scans. He said that the inhibition of VMAT2 could, over time, cause a persons brain to shift from a religious brain structure, they scientifically, you know they call it phenotype…but basically, you can change a religious brain to a non-religious brain structure. VMAT2 is apparently the scientific name for what people term the God Gene. At the end of the clip he says that he filed a proposal under the name FunVax to begin experimenting with the VMAT2 gene with the goal of creating a virus, like the flu virus, that will remove or replace this gene from people in the Middle East. Their goal of course was to create peace in the Middle East. "
>>12068595 from mb - us anon
The "borderline" normies are waking up.
I just came back from my local gun store. They are OUT of primers. They are OUT of rifle and pistol projectiles. VERY small selection of powders, limit 2#. They have about 100# of #7 1/2 shot. They have 12 and 20 gauge shotgun shells pre-loaded … what you see is what they got.
They have 4 shotshell presses. The Henry Company has told suppliers to stop calling.
The story is that people, unable to buy loaded ammo have tackled the art and science of reloading.
Because they can't find a $20 box of ammunition, they are dropping the big money into presses, scales and so on. Then they are finding that reloading components are also hard to find.
A lady (prospective customer who had just been turned away) was giving her adult son a family heirloom 9mm for Christmas, but couldn't find anything to shoot. She didn't want to exchange contact information or I'd have GIVEN her a box just to make the gift complete.
Apparently the choke point is in the suppliers of raw materials. to the manufacturers. I do not know if this is deliberate or just the market being unable to keep up with the riots all summer. Seeing the shitty attitude BATFE has turned on recently, I'd guess that its a combination of the two. I've heard that those companies which CAN get materials are working 3 shifts and expanding as quickly as possible (lag time for new equipment and facilities.)
SAUCE: Personal experience within the hour.
IRISH GOVERNMENT ADMITS COVID-19 DOES NOT EXIST❗️
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fNkXz0m2TCCL/
After months of arduous Freedom of Information Act requests, the Irish government has finally come clean and admitted that it has no scientific proof of the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19). What other nations will be next to admit that this pandemic was a hoax?
"AS PART OF OUR LEGAL ACTION, we had demanded proof that this virus actually exists [as well as] proof that lockdowns actually have any effect on the spread of viruses; that face masks are safe and prevent the spread of viruses - they do not. There are no such studies; that social distancing is scientifically sound - it is not. It is made up; that contact tracing has any effect on the spread of a virus - of course it doesn't. This organization here - is making it up as it goes along." - Gemma O'Doherty
Originally streamed live from the office of Tony Holohan, Chief Medical Officer of Ireland.
https://gemmaodoherty.com/
Source:
https://principia-scientific.com/irish-government-admits-covid-19-does-not-exist/
Top US Official Says 'Growing Body Of Evidence' Shows COVID-19 Leaked From Chinese Lab
The most 'credible' theory about the origin of COVID-19 is that it escaped from a Chinese laboratory, according to US National Security Adviser Matthew Pottinger, who made the comment during a Zoom meeting with UK officials.
"There is a growing body of evidence that the lab is likely the most credible source of the virus," said Pottinger, referring to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, according to the Daily Mail, which notes that 'even China's leaders openly admit their previous claims that the virus originated in a Wuhan market are false.'
Pottinger was one of the first US officials to sound the alarm at the White House over the origins of the virus in January 2020, when he initially suspected that the outbreak originated in a Chinese lab - after which Pottinger ordered US intelligence agencies to search for evidence. Good thing he kept this theory to himself, or Twitter may have banned him.
He also slammed the World Health Organization's probe as a ruse - saying "MPs around the world have a moral role to play in exposing the WHO investigation as a Potemkin exercise," referring to the facade villages created in 18th Century Crimea to convince the visiting Russian Empress Catherine the Great that the region was doing well.
Iain Duncan Smith, the former Tory Party leader who attended the meeting, said Mr Pottinger's comments represented a 'stiffening' of the US position on the theory that the virus came from a leak at the laboratory, amid reports that the Americans are talking to a whistleblower from the Wuhan institute.
'I was told the US have an ex-scientist from the laboratory in America at the moment,' he said. 'That was what I heard a few weeks ago.
'I was led to believe this is how they have been able to stiffen up their position on how this outbreak originated.'
He added that Beijing's refusal to allow journalists to visit the laboratory only served to increase suspicion that it was 'ground zero' for the pandemic. 'The truth is there are people who have been in those labs who maintain that this is the case,' he said.
'We don't know what they have been doing in that laboratory. They may well have been fiddling with bat coronaviruses and looking at them and they made a mistake. I've spoken to various people who believe that to be the case.' -Daily Mail
"Even establishment figures in Beijing have openly dismissed the wet market story," Pottinger told the call participants.
Meanwhile, emails obtained via a public records request revealed that influential scientists have been hard at work crafting the 'natural origin' thesis, while suggesting a lab leak as a 'fringe conspiracy theory.' Via USRTK.org:
-
-
*
-
Influential scientists and many news outlets have described the evidence as “overwhelming” that the virus originated in wildlife, not from a lab. However, a year after the first reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 in the Chinese city of Wuhan, little is known how or where the virus originated. Understanding the origins of SARS-CoV-2, which causes the disease COVID-19, may be crucial to preventing the next pandemic.
The emails of coronavirus expert Professor Ralph Baric - obtained through a public records request by U.S. Right to Know - show conversations between National Academy of Sciences (NAS) representatives, and experts in biosecurity and infectious diseases from U.S. universities and the EcoHealth Alliance.
On Feb. 3, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) asked the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) to “convene meeting of experts… to assess what data, information and samples are needed to address the unknowns, in order to understand the evolutionary origins of 2019-nCoV, and more effectively respond to both the outbreak and any resulting misinformation.”
Baric and other infectious disease experts were involved in drafting the response. The emails show the experts’ internal discussions and an early draft dated Feb. 4.
The early draft described “initial views of the experts” that “the available genomic data are consistent with natural evolution and that there is currently no evidence that the virus was engineered to spread more quickly among humans.” This draft sentence posed a question, in parentheses:
“[ask experts to add specifics re binding sites?]” It also included a footnote in parentheses: “[possibly add brief explanation that this does not preclude an unintentional release from a laboratory studying the evolution of related coronaviruses].”
In one email, dated Feb. 4, infectious disease expert Trevor Bedford commented:
“I wouldn’t mention binding sites here. If you start weighing evidence there’s a lot to consider for both scenarios.”
By “both scenarios,” Bedford appears to refer to lab-origin and natural-origin scenarios.
The question of binding sites is important to the debate about the origins of SARS-CoV-2. Distinctive binding sites on SARS-CoV-2’s spike protein confer “near-optimal” binding and entry of the virus into human cells, and make SARS-CoV-2 more contagious than SARS-CoV. Scientists have argued that SARS-CoV-2’s unique binding sites could have originated either as a result of natural spillover in the wild or deliberate laboratory recombination of an as-yet-undisclosed natural ancestor of SARS-CoV-2.
The final letter published Feb. 6 did not mention binding sites or the possibility of a laboratory origin. It does make clear that more information is necessary to determine the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The letter states,
“The experts informed us that additional genomic sequence data from geographically – and temporally – diverse viral samples are needed to determine the origin and evolution of the virus. Samples collected as early as possible in the outbreak in Wuhan and samples from wildlife would be particularly valuable.”
The emails show some experts discussing the need for clear language to counter what one described as “crackpot theories” of lab origin. Kristian Andersen, lead author of an influential Nature Medicine paper asserting a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, said:
the early draft was “great, but I do wonder if we need to be more firm on the question of engineering.”
He continued,
“If one of the main purposes of this document is to counter those fringe theories, I think it’s very important that we do so strongly and in plain language…”
In his response, Baric aimed at conveying a scientific basis for SARS-CoV-2’s natural origin.
“I do think we need to say that the closest relative to this virus (96%) was identified from bats circulating in a cave in Yunnan, China. This makes a strong statement for animal origin.”
Meanwhile, 27 scientists issued a statement drafted by Daszak (who didn't want to be identified as its author), in which they "strongly condemn[ed] conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” and reported that scientists from multiple countries “overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife.” The letter included no scientific references to refute a lab-origin theory of the virus.
One scientist, Linda Saif, asked via email whether it would be useful “to add just one or 2 statements in support of why nCOV is not a lab generated virus and is naturally occuring? Seems critical to scientifically refute such claims!”
Daszak responded, “I think we should probably stick to a broad statement.”
Growing calls to investigate the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a potential source of SARS-CoV-2 have led to increased scrutiny of EcoHealth Alliance.
The emails show how members of EcoHealth Alliance played an early role in framing questions about possible lab origin of SARS-CoV-2 as “crackpot theories that need to be addressed,” as Daszak told The Guardian.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/top-us-official-says-growing-body-evidence-shows-covid-19-leaked-chinese-lab