>https://git.sr.ht/~johnnyappleseed/pleromable
Anon, please provide moar background on your back grind for this project. Will it enable vids and pix assuming yes along with potential for PDF and docs – assuming moar difficult re storage.
Thanks for this.
What, they gonna have a skin tone test to qualify? Blood test? Prolly moar about the supposedly anti-islamophobia government-wide project Trudeau announced previously.
THE COVID POLICE STATE has arrived and will take a generation to uproot. That is if we start NOW.
MSM blatherings that suggest travel is banned when it is not banned.
Here are the Canadian politicians facing questions over travel amid COVID-19 restrictions
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadian-politicians-pandemic-travel-1.5859785
The 'pandemic' was over months ago.
The 'restrictions' do not amount to a ban on travel.
Don't blame the restrictons on a virus - blame it on government.
What kind of doublespeak is this - 'required public health advice'? Either it is advice or it is something else.
The real problem is not that some citizens have travelled but that this so-called 'required public health advice' is treated like a ban on any travel even on travel that does not contradict said advice. Travel is NOT banned.
Canadians need to challenge the restrictions as these are NOT justified in the first place.
It will get worse as the government plans to make it worse. Don't blame 'COVID-19'. Blame the government.
New COVID-19 testing rules for air travellers kick in Jan. 7
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/garneau-negative-test-airline-1.5858379
Travellers over the age of 5 will have to obtain a negative PCR test before arrival in Canada.
Under the new rule, travellers must receive a negative result on a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test — the standard nose swab test for detecting active COVID-19 infections — within 72 hours of boarding a flight to Canada.
Travellers who can prove that they were unable to get a test abroad will have to quarantine for 14 days at a federally-approved facility upon their arrival.
Documentation of a negative test result must be presented to the airline prior to boarding a flight to Canada, according to a government news release.
"While [the government hasn't] said it's forbidden by law, they strongly recommend people not travel. And industry is basically saying, come on down, the flights are open, weather's nice, it's nice and warm in the sunny Caribbean," he [John Gradek, a former Air Canada executive] said.
On Wednesday, Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc said it will be up to travellers to arrange for PCR tests themselves, given that those embarking on non-essential trips overseas have chosen already to flout public health guidelines.
"The government of Canada obviously is not in a position to set up in hotels or all-inclusive resorts or Canadian consulates," he told CBC News.
The new rule does not replace Canada's mandatory 14-day quarantine period for international travellers, which remains in force.
Garneau also said Thursday the government will be boosting its surveillance efforts to make sure travellers are following the rules. The penalties for breaking the Quarantine Act can include six months in prison or $750,000 in fines.
Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet said Thursday that the testing requirement should apply to all travellers, not just those arriving by air.
--
Yeh, so CANUCKS are you okay with politicians pushing for greater restrictions on your freedom of movement? What are you going to do about it?
The PCR is not a bonafide test for infection, nor for illness, nor even for viral load such as to assess contagiousness. The basis for the house of cards is PCR. And its bullshit.
Don't need MORE PCR. Need NO PCR. For fucks sake, it is not medically sound to diagnose with PCR; in fact, there is no good sense in testing healthy people who show no symptoms. A doctor meets his patient, listens to complaints/symptoms, observes - checks out the lungs or whatnot - and then assesses. If a test would be useful, the doctor can recommend it. But there is no set of symptoms unique to 'COVID-19' and no defintive symptom by which to diagnose this supposed illness. The clincian might reat symptoms, depending on the overall health of the patient, but is not likely to recommend any treatment if the patient shows no symptoms and is not ill.
FOR CRYING OUT LOUD. Cannuckers, what are you going to do about this bullshit?
FROM THE ARTICLE - which editorialized, by the way - 'those embarking on non-essential trips overseas have chosen already to flout public health guidelines'.
How is following advice considered to be 'flouting' guidelines? The doublespeak is sickening. Travel is not 'forbidden by law' but the government imposes a ridiculous 14-day house arrest EVEN IF THE PCR IS NEGATIVE.
How about calling it what this is? The government is flouting the constitution and the CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. The goofy guidelines - the stupid 'required advice' - is in now way justified by extraordinary emergency circumstances. They are calling it one thing but treating normalcy like its worthy of time in prison and tens of thousands of dollars in fines. WAY OUT OF PROPORTION because it is simply not scientifically justified. PERIOD.
FOR FUCKS SAKES.
Don't think this will be limited to international travel, frens, because this is going to apply across provincial boundaries and probablly also between 'zones'. ALL will be under surveillance under threat of mistreatment by police and courts.
Consider the little connudrum that the government has now created out of thin air. If a traveller could not get a test abroad, he has to prove he could not get one. PROVE TO WHOM and by what standard of evidence? Indeed, it is not the business of the government, nor of the airline as a designated enforcer, to know the medical and private business of free CANADIAN citizens. No amount of propaganda and panic amongst the government can justife that intrusion. There is NO emergency situtation. So people will have to tussle over implementation when the fucking things is ridiculous and lawles in the first place.
Consider the other phrase of doublespeak in all this - 'the standard nose swab test for detecting active COVID-19 infections' - GIVEMEABREAK.
Taking a sample from the back of the throat at the delicate barrier between nasal passage and BRAIN is NOT a nose swab sample.
This is not a standard test as PCR is NOT a test. Calling it a test does not change it from a manufacturing process for generating DNA sequences. Its purpose is for lab work and forensics. NOT diagnostics.
Calling it standard does not make this intrusive sample-taking standard.
PCR does NOT detect infections. Does not detect ACTIVE infections. Does not detect COVID-19 because COVID-19 is an illness that has no defintiive symptom nor a definitive set of symptoms that distinguish it from any number of other types of maladies.
The garbage that is being foisted on CANADIANS has got to stop. PCR depends on fragments of RNA that may or may not be remants of a virus. If the bits and pieces do not replicate themselves and that is the point of the PCR PROCESS which is to induce replication through artifical means. MY GOD how is it that we have a new industry fueld by government ignorance of the basics?
This doublespeak casts a spell on people. HOW will Canadians break that spell if not by outright dissent and refusal to comply? Trying to navigate some way of making implementation more reasonable or trying to ensure reasonable exemptions and whatnot, well, that is a fool's errand. Do not even suggest that the premise for these restrictions is reasonable in the first place.
FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT.
Right you are, fren, right you are.
Each of the ministers involved - transport, health, intergovernmental affairs - and the fucking PM and each and every fucking party's elected members of Parliament need a real dose of education. AND MORE THAN THAT they need to feel the heat and suffer some.
There is NO room in the constitutional order, much less in the CHARTER, for this flagrant abuse of Canadian citizens. I repeat - there is no authority under the constitutional order, under the Canadian convention of Responsible Government, under common law, under any system of governance to which Canadians have consented - zilch, nada, rien.
This is a profound erosion of trust between representatives i.e. servants and citizens. IT is an upending to make of citizens mere slaves who beg for a bit of leniency in a system of complete government control of all areas once protected by the constitutional order.
EACH AND EVERY government agent - elected or otherwise - who acts in this manner under the colour of law is committing a felony. This is not a matter of a majority of CANADIANS agreeing to give up their liberty. A minority of one citizen, just one, still has freedom and rights as per the constitutional order and NO MAJORITY, if one even exists, can give away what does not belong to it. The individual Canadian - yes even those between 5 and 18 years - are free and do not answer to the government nor beg the government, nor beg the MAJORITY, for the privilege of movement, assembley, speech, privacy, and all of the principles that give meaning to the constiitutional order.
We can argue the science. We can argue the politics. We can argue the doublespeak blatherings. But it comes down to refusing to give up what is yours and yours alone. And sometimes that means standing your ground even if you must stand alone.
AND USUALLY you will not be alone. AND SO the lawless government agents must feel the heat and suffer some coz this is not about convincing them with reason as they do not come remotely close to using reason to get their way so far. They need to be told NO and we have to dig in our heels and stand our ground.
Hell, where are the ethical doctors who know better? How is the universal health care system turned to dust at the mere hint of a 'new' virus? Can you trust your doctor if your doctor bends the knee and allows the government to intrude between you and your doctor - so much for the sacred patient-doctor relationship when a PCR replaces seeing your doctor when you might be ill with something.
Trust in peace officers begins to erode when they disturb the peace to enforce the bloody government restrictions. Trust in courts? We'll see I guess.
Citizens should feel no obligation, no duty, no self-incrimination over refusing to take and act on piss poor advice. Calling that advice a guidenline, calling a required kind of advice, and all the rest does not transform that piss poor advice into sound useful and healthy advice.
Reject the stupidity. Reject the shitty advice. Reject the guidance that steers you wrong. Think and act on your best interests.
By the way, do not be shamed by the false claim that there is a huge public health hazard to your acting on your best interests. There is no public health emergency. Without that there is no 'balancing' of rights. If you are not ill, you are not harming others by living your normal life. Even if you are a bit under the weather, it does NOT mean you have COVID-19 – they could never prove you had an illness or a disease because they have no symptom, or cluster of symptoms, that distinguish this supposed illness form other types of maladies that share the symptoms on the COVID-19 list. IT IS A LAUNDRY LIST, frens, that is a catchall. An excuse not to help the patient but to control society.
The supposed virus has not been purified nor isolated such that one could get a sample from a person known to have the virus and test for it and find that virus. You can not even detect the virus amongst those who have some of these symptoms and claim that the individual is ill with COVID-19 because they can not define that illness as distinct from other maladies. OK, SO THEY CAN NOT PROVE YOU HAVE THIS SUPPOSED ILLNESS - NOT BY SYMPTOMS AND NOT BY AN DETECTED VIRAL INFECTION.
Think what that means. They have no means of testing the reliabilitiy of the PCR. So they can not ethically rely on PCR to diagnose an infection. AND THEY HAVE NO means of using a test, an object detection, to match up with known symptoms because they do not have definitive symptoms. IT IS A NONSTARTER.
So rather than being cooperative in trying to prove you could or could not get a PCR OR THAT YOU GOT A NEGATIVE PCR, challenge the government to prove that they can detect viral infection, viral load, and illness through PCR alone. Guess what their out is? OH, well you might be asymptomatic. That just means you are healthy and that there is no viral load and no risk of transmission of what you do not have.
They have tied themselves into knots and the reason for this can not be for the good of public health. These heavy restrictions hurt public health. So the balance is not between a public health hazard versus an individual's liberty. The government has created an imbalance that can not be corrected by greater and greater restricitions. Any opposition politician who demands more restrictions is as much at fault as government politicians who race to be the most severe in reacting to this non-pandemic.
To correct the imbalance we do not need a vaccine and the looming threat of compulsory vaccinations. WE need our rights and freedoms to be protected. THAT IS THE CORRECTION. In that there is balance within our constitutional order.
Reject compromise on this point. IT IS THE KEY TO cutting off the bloodiminded fuckery that seems to be galloping off in all directions.
SAY NO. Reject pleas for leniency. DEMAND your rights be recognized and respected in action and not merely in doublespeak shite.
You are free. ACT LIKE IT.