>>12054274 (all LB)
>What do you mean by the wrong Donna Brazile account?
>I don't see any deleted Tweets from POTUS on Donna Brazile.
Check notables, anon.
>>12053733 (LB)
Indeed. Last tweet from that account squares up to a delta that corresponds with Donoghue drops, either way you calculate them (inclusive or exclusive of end date of POTUS tweet)
As a bonus, Sidney Powell RTed two separate tweets yesterday and today with that same Lincoln image from 1373
So it begins:
COVID vaccine reactions…
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1339288962775588864
It's like they don't have an original thought in their diseased heads.
Takeaways from The Amistad Project (TAP)news conference:
-
Zuck funneled over $500 million into elections through private charities.
-
The cities had enough federal funding and CARES Act $ for elections so there was no reason to inject private money into them.
-
By accepting these grants cities were under contract with CTCL (Center For Civic Life) and were obligated to use the $ to follow the parameters dictated by this group. IE: paying election judges, inspectors, workers, placing X amount of drop boxes, targeting specific communities for outreach efforts, pushing absentee/vote by mail, setting up "Satelite Election Offices", purchasing voting machines and software + more.
-
CTCL included claw back provisions that said if the county or city didn't follow what was in the contract, the city/county could be required to pay the grant back.
-
Election law requires bipartisan representatives at any "Polling Place" these counties circumvented the law by calling them "Satelite Election Offices" despite the fact that they performed ALL the functions of a "Polling Place". So no bipartisan oversight happened in any of these offices.
-
The question was posed if any of this was illegal. TAP argues that election law was violated because a.States are required to follow the election plan they have submitted. They cannot just change it without meeting/voting etc. b. It is the State that holds the power, not the county or City. For a city to choose to ignore the State plan and implement its own is unlawful. c. States cannot target certain demographics of their residents. By hand selecting which areas would be targeted for advertising and get out the vote efforts they have discriminated against all others in their State. Efforts have to go to all voters not just the ones most likely to vote for a desired candidate.