https://twitter.com/DariusJohnsonTV/status/1339298204203053058?s=20
Maybe McConnell is playing a part.
Rush was talking earlier about the Senate 52 to 48.
Wasn't the senate the target?
Now with Mitch "folding" (optics?), he is warning Republicans not to push for the Electoral Count Act. Would this old rather obscure law be getting more attention if Mitch hadn't done what he did yesterday?
They were talking about this EXACT scenario back in June FFS.
https://www.rollcall.com/2020/06/01/old-law-could-leave-2020-presidential-race-in-stalemate/
"Michigan’s Democratic secretary of state and governor would assign electors based on the popular vote that Biden won. But the Republican-led Legislature, if it grabs on to arguments that the popular vote was fraudulent or otherwise problematic, might claim it has the authority to assign its own slate of electors.
While no legislature has ever tried to seize that authority after an election takes place, Foley points out that the Florida Legislature tossed around the idea in the 2000 election aftermath.
In the Michigan example then, both sets of electors meet and send the results for Congress to tally. That’s when the muddled language of Section 15 might kick in.
The Senate and House would then have to split over which of the two counts to accept. This could happen, in theory, if Republicans retain control of the Senate in the election and Democrats do the same in the House."
"A report in The Atlantic alleges that Trump’s state and national legal teams are working towards for post-election strategies that would sidestep the results of the vote count in battleground states. According to the report, ambiguities in the Constitution and logical statement in the Electoral Count Act may make it possible to prolong the dispute all the way to Inauguration Day, which would bring the nation to an edge."
Bring a nation to an edge? What did Q say about a precipice again?