https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXKQ7VGzWVk

[05:28]

THank you.

Mr. Chairman as we go on with this I think it's important that we not stop

here. ALot of the laws that have to be confirmed and I think reaffirmed are

State laws, so it's not in our purview, but the STate laws are set and then

we have Federal Elections. SO what we have heard about what happened in

Wisconsin. What happened in Nevada. I think is absolutely true and we have

to prevent it from happening again. I think State Legislators Legislatures

will neeed to reaffirm that election law can only be changed by a State

Legislature.

So I think there is a lot of work to be done. While we will not dictate for

the States I think we should have hearings going into the next year. Hearing

from State Legislatures and what they are going to do to make sure election

law is upheld not changed by people who are not legislators. And we do have

an interest in that.

I do not want it to be Federalized. Many on the other side of the aisle

would just soon Federalize it, mail everybody a ballot and we'll have this

Universal Corruption throughout the land. But what I think we need to do

is keep it at the State level. But we can't just say that it dind't happen.

We can't just say Oh 4,000 people voted in Nevada that were non-citizens and

we're just going to ignore it.

We're going to sweep it under the rug so the courts have decided the facts.

The courts have not decided the facts. The courts never looked at the facts.

The courts don't like elections so they stayed out of it by finding an excuse,

standing or otherwise to stay out of it.

But the fraud happened the election in many ways was stolen and the only way it

will be fixed is by in the future, reinforcing the laws.

And the only last comment I would say is on what Mr Krebs, he can speak for

himself, but I think his job was keeping the foreigners out of the election.

It was the most secure election based on security of the internet and technology.

But he has never voiced an opinion, he is welcome to today, on whether or not

dead people voted. I don't think he examined that. DId he examine non-citizens

voting? SO to say it was the safest election, sure I agree with your statement,

If you are refering to foreign intervention. But if you are saying it's the

safest election based on no dead people voted. No signed citizens voted. No

people broke the absentee rules. I think that is false and I think that is

what's upset alot of people on our side is that they are taking your statement

to mean 'Oh well there was no problem in the election'. I don't think you have

examined many of the problems that we've heard here, so really you're just

referring to something differently is what I, the way I look at it.

Thank you Mr Chairman" [07:50]